#Reviewers

🎉 Kait 🎉

sixcrowsbooks

If we're being honest? NetGalley's mixture of the archive, ratio, and "not reviewing" option still counting against your ratio ultimately hurts/penalizes the readers.And to what end? A large chunk of

Jonathan Brauer

RealJonBrauer

(Thread) I fully support the aims of this research & generally agree w/authors’ stated positions re: the field's problems & reform needs. But I think some of the conclusions are

Gilad Feldman

giladfeldman

= Replication publications in reputable psychology journals =Let's talk about replication in psychology. We think we've been doing better in the last decade, but have we improved?Thread below. A

Prof Amy Brown 🕷🤱🐘

Prof_AmyBrown

I found this Facebook memory today & thought I would share. Would have been my first independent paper as a PhD student. It didn't get accepted until 2010 for a

dr_disrespect(pro.max)

Rgn_Indian

Get ready for1.Bala,Ramya might not be winner but won hearts kidney dawww.2.aari won because of his p.r dawww.3. Host and editors too biased daww.4. Aari fans herd mentality dawww.5. Season

Lili (USOM)

UtopiaMind

I have SO MANY thoughts re: e-arcs and bookstagram. I don't even know where to begin honestly. First of all, I think there's no disputing that e-arc photos tend to

Emmanuel Antony

EmmanuelAntony5

This is what happens when "Tech Reviewers" don't know tech. Maybe we can call them glorified video editors or maybe fanboys.https://twitter.com/tldtoday/status/1326610187529023488 Oh for those of you wondering, this tweet was

svastiharicharan

svastiharichar1

Dear editors and reviewers of leading journals in biomed and oncology @nature @ScienceMagazine @CellCellPress @JAMAOnc @NEJM, please read the following as a guide for actually fostering diversity in research vs

Stephan Heunis - Every day I'm Job Searchin' 🎶🕺

fmrwhy

Discussion that I think is worth having out in the open: coauthors and I were rejected from having a neuroimaging dataset reviewed in @ScientificData because data access required signing a

Dr. Paula R. Curtis

paularcurtis

A thread on some writing/publication reflections while editing my article:In a grad methods course, we were told to pick a footnote in a book related to our research, find the author's

sweta agrawal

hokuba

I was recently awarded a #K99/R00 from the #NIH. Not going to lie, it was a lot of work and I got a lot of help. Also, NIH is complicated

Maggie Crowley

maggiecrowley

Simple framework for presenting WIP to execs & others that’s been working:Start w/ problem framed as a story w/ real customer exampleExec summary of research to build trust1 pg summary

Chris Morten

cmorten2

Aducanumab & FDA transparency in the news. @US_FDA appears on the cusp of approval, & Biogen's market cap surged >$10B, but does the drug actually work? At least one expert

Jeremy Robert Johnson

JRJ_Is_Probable

Quick thread on the ongoing Reviewer Discourse:1. Check out the reviews below. Same book. Two different reviewers. Both of them are exactly right.2. The moment you jump from creation to

Daniel J. Blake, PhD

danielhighered

Q for higher ed qualitative people: Does our field have a methodology problem? My take: Yes a focus on teaching the Creswell 5 has left a generation of researchers believing

Gaurav Sabnis 🇮🇳🇺🇸

gauravsabnis

The Annihilation of Caste by Ambedkar. Until I read it, I was the garden variety "casteism is bad BUT merit is important AND caste is dead in cities AND what

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.