#Reviewers

Jim Woodgett

jwoodgett

Some observations on on-line peer review. 1. Likely going to be the norm due to efficiency, green-ness, reduces cost. Good reasons, get used to it. 2. Reduces discussion. This is

Teresa M. Bejan

tmbejan

Wow, I'm touched by the response here, especially from students embarking on their own peer-review journeys!A few thoughts on my own over the years:https://twitter.com/tmbejan/status/1356291403937181699 Rejection is a part of the

Forever

readforeverpub

#Reviewers, lots of questions lately about timing of reviews.Here's our take: If you are so excited about an early read and may burst, you should probably be buzzing about it

Jen Herman 🌪️

JukeBaRosh

Low accountability in closed system. Reviewers can get by w/lazy review, ask 4 unreasonable things, review same paper multiple times for different journals, have undeclared COI, etc...More importantly power differentials/favors

Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega

raulpacheco

I have four million things to work on, so, of course we all know I'm about to do another Twitter thread. This time, on how to write a Response-To-Reviewers-And-Editor document.

Lisa Starr

LisaStarrPhD

OK, maybe this is unnecessarily trodding somewhere I don't need to go, but I'm not into the trend of pressuring people to sign reviews. This turned into a ...https://twitter.com/MiriForbes/status/1288782831628374018 1)

Hillary Monahan

HillaryMonahan

Writers, new writers, one day writers:There will be people you love who'll dislike your books. Strangers, too. It's part of the deal.These people aren't your enemies. They aren't bad people.

Javeed Sukhera MD PhD

javeedsukhera

A few thoughts about research funding pertaining to systemic racism, structural bias, and inequity in health sciences and related disciplines... As a qualitative researcher with a PhD in education, finding

Joao Monteiro

immuno_stuff

Basic stuff you should know if you are working on #COVID19 and planning to submit your results for publication (1/9) Most journals are currently overwhelmed with unprecedented increase in submissions

Stephen Floor

stephenfloor

Scientists: "publishing is broken, I can't believe how much I have to do to publish a paper now!"Scientists as reviewers: "You have to repeat all these experiments in another cell

Rebecca Burch, MD

RebeccaCBurch

“Why did my paper get rejected?” Recent conversations with researcher friends made me realize that academic journal/editorial decision making can feel very opaque. To shed some light, here’s a rough

Behnam Neyshabur

bneyshabur

Some people say that one shouldn't care about publication and the quality matters. However, the job market punishes those who don’t have publications in top ML venues. I empathize with

Michelle Cardel,PhD, MS, RD

MichelleCardel

Today, I finished my 4th @NIH study section (though first one via Zoom). I have learned so much through these experiences on what reviewers want, and more importantly, what they

On Takahashi （高橋温）

OnTakahashi

【Paid Manga Reviews】Today a competitor who has key roles in two manga publishers expressed disappointment that Irodori Comics doesn't pay people to review their doujinshi. We have never paid for

Tage Rai

tage_rai

Some thoughts, as this has caused me to introspect on my own process-1) "Both editors judged that the manuscript warranted extended review."Put everything else aside. Its a correlation and a

Kathryn Goodenough

kmgoodenough

Some of you might be interested in what an exec editor's job involves. So here's the history of the paper I'm working on right now. It was submitted in Nov

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.