#Reviewers

Jason Coupet

ProfessaJay

Unpopular opinion: too much work is submitted to Public Administration journals. I'm not a journal editor, so maybe my opinion isn't worth much. But doing these reviews man, like alot

Laura Portwood-Stacer, PhD (she/her)

lportwoodstacer

A quick writing tip for when you get revision suggestions from an editor or peer reviewer and you're filled with a sense of dread or resistance because it seems like

Joshua Achiam

jachiam0

Hot take: deep RL research has stagnated because conferences have created bad incentives, rewarding researchers for vacuous claims of novelty, tenuous-at-best theoretical connections, or SOTA, while punishing boring analysis of

J. J. Hanna

authorjjhanna

Ok. This may end up being controversial, but it needs to be said.On ARCs, asking for reviews, and the need for kind honesty in publishing, a thread: 1. First, I

Vinay Prasad MD MPH

VPrasadMDMPH

Sunday advice for the budding/ junior medical researcher:Before you get too wedded to your project, consider What if everything my PI has told me is *wrong? [thread]*not original word choice

Dr. Kim Parker (she | her)

TchKimPossible

I've just completed reviewing my @ncte proposals for the 2021 convention and have noticed a few things:1. Citations. If you're citing the work of BIPOC educators, scholars, etc., you have

Anthony Neil Smith

anthonynsmith

Subtweet to a retweet of a subtweet. You know what, writers? Be bitter sometimes if you want. Be upset. It happens. Sometimes you get jealous. You can't help it. And

Dave Chalker

DaveTheGame

As someone who served on the pro-4e side of the edition wars, and was involved in early pre-public playtesting of 5e, I can say this thread is spot on. However,

Dr. Shannon Macauley

macauleylab

Coming off reviewing grad school applications for two programs at Wake Forest. Here are my PERSONAL opinions on applications in biomedical research if you are prepping for next year .

DJ

LifeinFiction

Advance Readers' Copies and the Like: A Basic, Not All-Encompassing Overview-This thread is comprised of the knowledge and insights I've picked up over the years.-Relates to traditional publishing and physical/printed

Brian Nosek

BrianNosek

New paper "Research Quality of Registered Reports Compared to the Traditional Publishing Model" by @cksoderberg Tim Errington @SchiavoneSays @julia_gb @FSingletonThorn @siminevazire Kevin Esterling and me. Preprint: https://osf.io

Meredith Vanstone

MGVanstone

I always start reviewing @CIHR_IRSC doctoral scholarship applications thinking of it as service that feels like a chore, but finish feeling super excited about the amazing health research trainees working

Maya Jay

neurojaym

Time for a rant: grant reviewers, why are we penalizing applicants for not publishing peer-reviewed papers as undergraduates?! Publishing as an undergrad, when most work is part-time, means that whether

Dr. Cindy Veldhuis (PhD!) 🏳️‍🌈🗽

CindyBVeldhuis

A thread: In LGBT research, we often use what is called the "two step method" to measure gender identity. This means you ask about sex assigned at birth (the sex

Romance Sparks Joy!

sparkjoyromance

And we’re back with our semi-regular feature #InTheLoveseat. We've been planning our feature on Corey Alexander @TGStoneButch for the last month and had been in contact w/ them about what

Catherine Scott

Cataranea

Dear peer reviewers: please take the time to be kind. Remember that, more often than not, the author of the paper you are reviewing is a student. There is no

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.