#Scotus

⚡ Mαχιмυs 🔥 Ɗeploяaвιlιѕ⚡

Maximus_4EVR

Incoming... FYI Election Update-Well, well, seems I was right in my pinned thread from 11/13 and their strategy has always been to "count" only uncontested states EVs.-All we've been seeing

Kasey Suffredini

KaseySuffredini

A lot of people have asked me what yesterday’s #SCOTUS ruling means for other federal laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex. Here’s my take. #LGBTQ discrimination in

Susan "No Whataboutism" Bagwell

SweetieWalker

SO, considering how the now-conservative-leaning SCOTUS ruled on Pennsylvania's election challenge yesterday, it would appear partisans from both sides of the political aisle need to issue some apologies. Think about

Mary Ziegler

maryrziegler

Hard to know how to read this, but I assume there must be serious interest in taking this case. So let's break down why this case might intrigue the Court's

Joanna Schwartz

JCSchwartzProf

Today’s summary reversal in Taylor v. Riojas is a big deal. In it, SCOTUS breathed new life into the notion that qualified immunity should be denied if the constitutional violation

Alex Silverman

AlexSilverman

The Attorneys General of OH, MO, AL, AK, FL, KY, LA, MS, SC, SD, & TX have filed amicus briefs in the PA segregated ballots matter before SCOTUS, arguing the

Michael F. Cannon

mfcannon

As I type, #SCOTUS is hearing #CAvTX, challenging the constitutionality of #ObamaCare. The media have described me as “ObamaCare’s Enemy No. 1.” So you'd think I'd want the Court to

Steve Vladeck

steve_vladeck

1. A lot of reactions today to Justice Alito moving up the deadline for PA to respond to @MikeKellyPA's application for an emergency injunction to throw out PA's certification of

Eric Schumacher

emschumacher

A Thread About #SCOTUS Justices The #SCOTUS has not had a Democrat-nominated Chief Justice since 1953. "But the #SCOTUS justices!" has been a Republican campaign-issue since Nixon's campaign in 1968.

Ron

CodeMonkeyZ

Justice delayed is Justice DENIED.Is SCOTUS intentionally dragging its feet to avoid getting involved in any legal challenges concerning the election? SCOTUS is intended to be a vanguard for the

D Alex

D_Alex_connect

In refusing to hear the Texas case against the four states which had refused to abide by Article II, § 1, cl. 2, the nine #SCOTUS justices committed a wrong

Radley Balko

radleybalko

Congress needs to codify the provocation rule into federal law. Here’s what this means: Let’s say a cop breaks down your door without a warrant, or with a bad warrant.

BECKET

BECKETlaw

THREAD: All about today’s argument in #Fulton v. Philadelphia. Both the Justices and the parties agreed that Catholic Social Services, Sharonell Fulton, and Toni Simms-Busch do vital work to protect

Ashlie Weeks

ashlie_weeks

THREAD: I haven’t touched politics bc I needed a break/SCOTUS should refuse 2 hear the election litigation by 45* as an initial matter. So many resources have been wasted &

🇺🇸 PENNSYLVANIA IS TRUMP™ (K) 🇺🇸

RED_IN_PA

New thread from REX:1. OK THIS IS BIG.Parnell/Kelly have filed at SCOTUS.If I am correct, this is going to be AWESOME.https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A9f9ba0f6-1e36-40e1-ab2c-309c14a9f5f0#pageNum=1 2.

Courtney Milan 🦖

courtneymilan

Okay, so this is a fairly decent explainer about how SCOTUS decides to take cases, but I think it's a little vague and lacking in some background explanation.https://www.goldsteinrussell.com/pro-bono/supreme-court-criteria/ https://twit

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.