#Scotus

BECKET

BECKETlaw

Today #SCOTUS heard oral argument in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, where a Georgia Gwinnett College student was threatened with arrest for speaking inside of a “Free Speech zone” on campus, sued,

Bansi Sharma

bansisharma

1. Misgivings About SCOTUS's Dismissal of the Texas LawsuitI am not a constitutional scholar, but allow me to dispel a few misgivings about the Texas lawsuit dismissal by SCOTUS, if

Sean Casten

SeanCasten

126 members of the @HouseGOP asked SCOTUS to throw out the results of democratic elections in GA, PA, WI and MI. 121 members voted AFTER terrorists stormed the capital to

NARAL

NARAL

Yesterday #SCOTUS sided with Trump to reinstate the requirement that people have to receive medication abortion in person. It’s the first abortion case with Amy Coney Barrett on the bench—and

Cynthia Cox

cynthiaccox

Does Biden’s presidential win make the ACA (#Obamacare) more likely to survive tomorrow’s Supreme Court case? Only marginally, and it would all come down to Georgia. Here's why: (1/7) 2/

Mike Dunford

questauthority

So - It's either late or early, I don't know which. I do have some messages and mentions expressing concern about the Commonwealth Court ruling in PA and the new

⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️President-Elect AfroCon

kdlewis04

Quick history thread by Paralegal Afro. All roads lead to Georgia. An arrogant state. States primarily have sovereign immunity. Art 3 allowed federal courts to hear disputes between a state

Kara Westercamp

KaraWestercamp

Everyone’s going on about this Texas case, but forget about the “Honey War” case of 1839, which almost led to armed conflict between Iowa and Missouri. State of Missouri v.

annika !

annika_reed

It is legal for the government to sterilize people if they deem someone “unfit” to carry on the human race. There is a SCOTUS stamp of approval on it. Eugenics

kilgore trout, back in some form

KT_So_It_Goes

here comes the dipshit brigade exclaiming AHA PERFECT JUST COMPLETELY PULVERIZED IN COURT AGAIN SCOTUS HERE WE COMEhttps://twitter.com/MikeScarcella/status/1332376306005184516 right on cuehttps://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/13323801800

Black LGBTQIA+ Migrant Project (BLMP)

OfficialBLMP

As we celebrate the #SCOTUS DACA victory today, we must remember a few very important things. A thread! This victory would not have happened without the work & sacrifice of

Steve Vladeck

steve_vladeck

In case you were wondering if @tedcruz has *any* principles, this case asks #SCOTUS to hold that whether a *state law* violates a *state constitution* somehow implicates the *federal* Constitution—and

Richard A Harrison

RAHarrisonPA

SCOTUS TX CASE - RANDOM THOUGHTS1/ Standing - those arguing that TX lacks standing to sue under the Elections & Electors Clause are, in essence, arguing that it is a

LVNancyAgain

again_lv

"Don't tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren't dealing with riots then. You're forgetting what your role is here Neil,and I don't want to hear from the two junior

Jamal Greene

jamalgreene

Under SCOTUS rules, cert in this capital case, which skipped the court of appeals, should have been granted only if "the case is of such imperative public importance as to

Steve Vladeck

steve_vladeck

It looks like we have a new leader in the “craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election” category:The State of Texas is suing Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin *directly*

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.