#Scotus

Doug Billings

DougBillings

Long thread:1) "The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not

John

Johnheretohelp

Hey Sullivan, something you should know. You were Never, Not Once, ever discussed about being nominated for the SCOTUS. Your great buddies, Cummings, Obama, Holder, all lied to you. Why

Raffi Melkonian

RMFifthCircuit

Here's the deal. There are in fact cases - cases where the Supreme Court law is against you - where your only job is to lose in the lower courts

Marc-André Argentino

_MAArgentino

1/ This post was shared by a QAnon channel on Telegram. The post itself is nothing special, it's a typical QAnon decode where apparently SCOTUS will be filling on the

CulturalHusbandry

APhilosophae

SCOTUS TEXAS V. PA EXPECTATIONS:Rejecting the case or refusing to hear are unlikely (ie. fight between the states will undermine federal power unless addressed)SCOTUS ruling forces State legislatures to solve

Rick Hasen

rickhasen

So I think the Supreme Court performed pretty well during the pandemic, scheduling remote oral arguments with live audio and getting the most important cases out only a week late.

Optimistic Fridge Intern🦁🇺🇲

fridgeintern

I've seen this in a few places but I want to repeat in case you haven't.Regarding the Texas SCOTUS case, it will be heard, especially since so many states have

Mike Sacks

MikeSacksEsq

Because we all know it’s “the left & their partners in the legacy media” that control what cases SCOTUS chooses to hear, not the justices themselves on a court that’s

Akiva Cohen

AkivaMCohen

1) SCOTUS cannot reverse a state supreme court on an issue of state law. The argument is that under PA state law, laches can't bar consideration of a constitutional challenge

Steve Vladeck

steve_vladeck

I see folks have discovered the 12th Amendment and the (well-known) role of the House when there is no electoral college winner.But the mere *existence* of litigation or recounts doesn’t

Steve Vladeck

steve_vladeck

1. Texas is trying to sue PA, GA, MI, and WI to challenge their election results *directly* in #SCOTUS.How can it do that, how does that work, and is this

Rogan O’Handley 🇺🇸

DC_Draino

(Thread)There’s a small part of me that believes SCOTUS threw out the Texas lawsuit to boost their credibility for future election cases that may benefit TrumpTrump appointed 3 Justices, all

David Corn

DavidCornDC

In its suit trying to throw out the votes of GA, WI, PA & MI, the state of Texas claims the odds of Biden winning those states is "less than

Steve Vladeck

steve_vladeck

I got an e-mail today from a county official in Texas who had some choice words about my analysis of the Texas #SCOTUS case and my responsibility as a law

Richard A Harrison

RAHarrisonPA

SCOTUS PA CASE PREDICTION: trying to guess what SCOTUS will do in a case like this is a fool's errand, but the Twitterverse keeps asking me what I think, so

Ahmed Baba

AhmedBaba_

Trump's strategy has long been clear:1) Lie about voter fraud in mail-in ballots.2) Push base to vote in person.3) Slow down mail so fewer ballots received by Nov 3.4) Falsely

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.