#Question

Jonathan Urick

jonathanurick

Hot take: Courts might be able to review the legality of this impeachment, even under current political-question doctrine. Here’s why and how the issue might arise:https://twitter.com/jonahdispatch/status/1350838938727018497 Suppose Senat

Aimée Morrison

digiwonk

The way my brain works: I'm like a slot machine, that pays jackpots every time. The only catch is that *someone* has to pull the handle, or *something* has to

Evan J. Zimmerman

ejzim

The "remote" discussion mostly conflates two different aspects:(1) Where are your team members based?(2) Do you have an office?These questions are related, but not equivalent. Two examples.https://twitter.com/jeremysliew/status/13

Joe Barnes

Barnes_Joe

1/ Some Brexit unrest on the EU side? Capitals are beginning to question whether the trade deal negotiated by Michel Barnier will be an acceptable compromise. One source asks: 'The

Nicholas Cole

quilldir

Sn. Cruz argues that an electoral commission should be set up. The difficulty here is that the Constitution grants Congress the power to determine the Presidency only if the votes

Father

LegendThePoet

Masculine people, I have a question that I know will piss our counterparts off and start mess via Twitter, but I have to ask because I wonder if anyone else

stan

bothgoats

Pep Guardiola to Juventus:- How likely is it?- When would it happen?- Could it work?Thread below, any RTs appreciated: The first question is Pep’s availability:- His current contracts ends in

HG

HiljaGebest

So why are some people unable to mount a good protective T-cell response? The key to this question might be a 10-year-old Danish study led by Carsten Geisler, head of

Dr. Kira Thurman

kira_thurman

Hi gang! I'm not on twitter much right now, but because several of you have asked for my take on the question, "Was Beethoven Black?"Here's my answer as a scholar

Avthar.com 🇿🇦🇺🇸

avthars

Reading for Meaning (A Thread)You were taught how to read aloud as a child, but you were probably never taught to read for meaning. Reading for meaning means reading things

Jodie Schram

jodie_schram

I wonder how many NHS Trusts look into the most commonly asked interview questions, particularly for mid-level managers? Interviews are a test to see whether a candidate has the skills

DCPetterson

dcpetterson

All the angst about recounts, or election lawsuits, or states appointing their own slate of electors, or SCOTUS overturning the election, or the Senate refusing to "certify" the results, or

Benjamin Wittes

benjaminwittes

Ten thoughts on the situation: (1) The last line of defense of democracy is the hearts and minds of the citizenry. Where is your heart? Where is your mind? (2)

cops aren't workers, no unions for cops 🌾

tyelland

one of the many ways journalism grinds people down: certain issues are 'political' in ways others are not (to editors, bosses). eg it's a-ok to support cdn foreign policy but

Lux 🤷🏻‍♀️ Alptraum

LuxAlptraum

The problem with so many discussions about systemic oppression — racism, sexism, transphobia, ableism, etc — is that a lot of us want to reduce it to a question of

Abigail Thorn

PhilosophyTube

In case anyone needs it, here's the system I used to come top of my year when I did my philosophy degree! 1/6 Do the Week 1 reading in Freshers'

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.