#Court

sinan ulgen

sinanulgen1

In return, if the position of Greece, firmly backed by France, remains that the only problem is the continental shelf issue and nothing else can be discussed because they pertain

Doug Nazarian

dnazarian

Today marks fifty years from the day our colleague, The Hon. Charles E. Moylan, Jr., took his seat on the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. Here is his official Maryland

Donald J. Trump

realDonaldTrump

“This is what we know. We have to go back to the state level and how this morass came to be in the first instance. The Governor, Wolf, and the

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. This election has exposed the complete collapse of the judiciary as a check on unconstitutional acts by state officials eviscerating legislative authority under our federal constitution (Art. II, Sec.

Varad Mehta

varadmehta

Breaking: Supreme Court holds firing transgender workers VIOLATES Title VII. BREAKING: Supreme Court applies Title VII to gay and transgender workers. LOLOLOLOL: Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion. Trump is done.

Surbhi M. Karwa

surbhi_karwa

Courts as 'Fathers' : A Dialogue Comparison Recently, while reading the High Court in Hadiya case I felt that wordings of the court's order echoed exact lines of a typical

SpinningHugo

SpinningHugo

Again, without commenting on the substance of the Tavistock decision, there is a high profile lawyer who regrets the decision who is criticising the court for the procedure it took

TheTributeAct

TheTributeAct

What is going on with Sevco, Castore, and Big Mike?In the absence of public information, I'll hazard an (educated) guess in the posts below. Court injunctions- that have not been

Jo Maugham

JolyonMaugham

In a 2004 decision (Re Alex) the Family Court of Australia found that the court's permission was required for puberty blockers. It took until 2013 for that decision to be

Conor Gallagher

ConorGallaghe_r

Kinahan's latest statement to @talkSPORT takes aim at the Special Criminal Court. Many people have reasonable issues with the SCC but his criticism is misleading in a few ways. First,

Adrian Short

adrianshort

For anyone who's read the Court of Appeal judgment in this case, which I presume includes Dolan and his lawyers, this should be the least surprising result ever.It's nice of

David Banks

DBanksy

There are an awful lot of experts in how to defend a libel action on here today, aren’t there? #LabourAntisemitism Of course, having to issue an apology, and pay damages

Adam Klasfeld

KlasfeldReports

BREAKING:Wisconsin Supreme Court REJECTS Trump campaign's last-gasp suit there."We conclude the Campaign is not entitled to the relief it seeks." Background, @LawCrimeNews: https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/wisconsin-supre

Ian Millhiser

imillhiser

1) This is exactly right, for reasons that I explain here: https://www.vox.com/2020/12/2/21726876/supreme-court-religious-liberty-revolutionary-roman-catholic-diocese-cuomo-amy-coney-barrett https://twitter.com/dorfonlaw/status/133416688969

Wendy Lyon

wendylyon

Have had a piece about Bell v Tavistock in my head for a week but no time to write it TL;DR version: it's flawed in the same way Re L

Tanja Hester 😷 BLM 🏳️‍🌈🌏

our_nextlife

Despite the election news, the Affordable Care Act is still in front of the Supreme Court this week. The plan you select for next year will remain in effect no

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.