#Alito

John Fabian Witt

JohnFabianWitt

Justice Alito's Federalist Society speech is a good time to recall that gov't regulations to prevent spread of infectious diseases go back to the founding of the U.S. and indeed

BECKET

BECKETlaw

Today’s #SCOTUS win in #Espinoza v. Montana Board of Revenue is a BIG VICTORY for #religiousfreedom not just in schools, but across the board. Here’s why (THREAD): First, the Court

John Kruzel

johnkruzel

Let's do a MEGATHREAD while we wait for arguments to begin in the big GOP challenge to ObamaCare at SCOTUS, shall we? (you can listen to it on CSPAN at

Mike Dunford

questauthority

It's been a bit more than 12 hours since SCOTUS tossed out the Texas v Pennsylvania et al lawsuit, and the disinformation narratives are starting to stabilize a bit. So

Steve Deace

SteveDeaceShow

Only 2 Supreme Court justices, Thomas and Alito (neither appointed by Trump), apparently have any intellectual curiosity about the integrity of election law. The longest-tenured conservatives on the bench were

Trump Won Ninja Thornback

NThornback

1/ Okay folks, let analyze the SCOTUS decision. These are only My thoughts & opinion take or leave em Pro: Thomas & Alito. Both good conservative judges, appointed by other

Lawrence Hurley

lawrencehurley

GOP challenge to PA election result has now *actually* been filed at the Supreme Courthttps://twitter.com/lawrencehurley/status/1334202504565952514 This has happened after the PA Supreme Court rejected similar request This case, brought by

Steven Mazie

stevenmazie

BREAKING: A splintered Supreme Court grants *partial* relief to churches in California challenging COVID public-health orders limiting prayer attendance, but requests to lift percentage capacity restrictions and permit indoor singing

Steve Vladeck

steve_vladeck

1. A lot of reactions today to Justice Alito moving up the deadline for PA to respond to @MikeKellyPA's application for an emergency injunction to throw out PA's certification of

Doug Billings

DougBillings

Long thread:1) "The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not

Mike Sacks

MikeSacksEsq

We'll see how this prediction holds up with the signals the justices are set to send in just a few minuteshttps://twitter.com/MikeSacksEsq/status/1325584057493819395 Roberts probing whether individual plaintiffs have standing because ev

Sean T at RCP

SeanTrende

So my Poli Sci 1100 class from Fall '19 will remember -- or should! -- me saying that I thought the arg. in the Title VII cases would have significant

Stephen Mouritsen

s_mouritsen

Stand back for an extremely minor observation about Bostock. Like super small potatoes. 1/x J. Gorsuch says: "What did 'discriminate' mean in 1964? As it turns out, it meant then

Mark Joseph Stern

mjs_DC

Here's a terrific preview of today's oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the latest census case. This time around, Trump is trying to exclude undocumented immigrants from the population

Gregg Gonsalves

gregggonsalves

#ConeyBarrett #Alito, #Thomas, #Kavanaugh, #Gorsuch either practicing Catholics or raised as such should read this new dissent in "Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. Cuomo". It's by his

Jessica Mason Pieklo

Hegemommy

God save the United States and this honorable Court. Arguments in the ACA case are about to begin https://www.c-span.org/video/?471185-1/health-care-law-supreme-court-oral-argument California Solicitor General is up to start and makes the v

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.