#Alito

Ellen M. Gilmer

ellengilmer

Good morning, and welcome to a busy work week. Among ~other~ things happening this week, the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in an important case that will set the course

Max Kennerly

MaxKennerly

Hawley's argument is: starting in 1937, Pennsylvania has repeatedly violated its state constitution—including with an October 2019 bill supported by 132 out of 137 Republican state legislators that not one

Mark Joseph Stern

mjs_DC

Texas Republicans have asked a federal judge to throw out 100,000 ballots in Harris County cast through curbside voting. They drew Judge Andrew Hanen, one of the most notoriously partisan

Steve Berman

stevengberman

Since Tuesday, there’s been stories, theories, and a few frivolous lawsuits but little hard evidence of any vast election-stealing conspiracy. 1/ President Trump has consistently remarked that Democrats would try

Zack Ford

ZackFord

THREAD: Set aside the election for a moment. This morning, SCOTUS is hearing arguments in a case about a Catholic foster care agency in Philly that insists it should be

Veteran_1987 🇺🇸🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Sgt_Mac87

Quick Recap of all the swing states whose 2020 election results are being contested, summarized in 250 characters/state: Feel free to comment & add more information to particular states. PA:

Lindsey Simmons

LynzforCongress

I let this go yesterday because I’m trying to ignore the blithering nonsense that rolls out of this counterfeit senator’s mouth.But I want us to take a few minutes and

Joe Palmore

palmore_joe

Good morning from Washington, where the fate of the #ACA is yet again before the Supreme Court. I plan to live-tweet the oral argument. First a couple disclosures: I filed

Courtney Milan 🦖

courtneymilan

Okay, so this is a fairly decent explainer about how SCOTUS decides to take cases, but I think it's a little vague and lacking in some background explanation.https://www.goldsteinrussell.com/pro-bono/supreme-court-criteria/ https://twit

Maajid أبو عمّار

MaajidNawaz

Texas is disputing US election results in 4 swing states: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin & GeorgiaUnder Article III, US Supreme Court settles disputes between 2 or more statesDue to safe harbour,

𝕁𝔽𝕂 𝕒 𝕝𝕒 𝕂𝕣𝕒𝕜𝕖𝕟

JfkTebow

So the SCOTUS said no. They won't hear the case. Cue crazy leftists and their inane celebrations. You're probably pissed off by now because you thought the SCOTUS was going

D'Plorbl DREGs

DontDregMeBro

Recall from Dec 6,SCOTUS put a hold on scheduled executions AT THE TIME.Justice ALITO presumed Gov't would eventually prevail to resume Execution course.He was right.https://amp.dailycaller.com/2019/12/06/supreme-court-trump-death-penal

Leah Litman

LeahLitman

I'm so scared Chief asks CA SG Mongan about standing -- are people who don't buy health insurance in violation of the law? Mongan says no.Chief wants to know if

Teri Kanefield

Teri_Kanefield

Here's the Mazars opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-715_febh.pdfTrump lost. The case has been remanded back to the lower courts. As with Vance, only Alito and Thomas dissented. Whether we see them before the

Brad Heath

bradheath

A few amici have filed at the Supreme Court today in support of a case seeking to declare that Pennsylvania's mail-in voting scheme violates the state constitution, thereby throwing out

Mimi NL

MimiNguyenLy

1/ @JennaEllisEsq 2 @newsmax on #TexasLawSuit #SupremeCourt ruling: This is a moral failure across all 3 branches so far of government.First you have the executive branch. The problem there is

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.