#Witnesses

Greg Sargent

ThePlumLineGS

Damning new facts show Trump may have known Pence's life was in danger when Trump attacked Pence during the insurrection. Democrats simply must call witnesses. If Trump knowingly pointed this

Raffi Melkonian

RMFifthCircuit

The thread on trial breaks reminds me of the first trial I attended here, where a very Texan trial lawyer stood up and Michael Scott declaring bankruptcy style bellowed "Judge

Daniel Goldman

danielsgoldman

Short thread on impeachment witnesses:First, let’s remember that this case had unusual and powerful evidence in the public record. If you are prosecuting a bank robbery and you have the

Rhuta Bhayga

RhutaBhayga2

For everyone upset because the Dems did not call witnesses (I was) here's some clarification from several sources, including Del. Stacey Plaskett:1) We would not have seen witnesses testify in

Jonathan Turley

JonathanTurley

So here is my question: why has the House not used the last few weeks to call these witnesses and build the needed case to show intent to incite an

Howard ✡

HowardA_Esq

Thread on why you should *not* be angry re no witnesses 1) the GOP vowed to acquit no matter what2) LeninGraham desperately wants to delay the Merrick Garland confirmation -

Tim Doyle- SERIOUS ARTIST PERSON GUY.

NakatomiTim

If you’re mad at the Democrats for how the GOP is voting and behaving, you’re part of the problem. If you think a single Republican vote would have been changed

@amuse

amuse

IMPEACHMENT THREAD: The last non-Trump-related impeachment process lasted 127 days. Congress examined thousands of documents, hundreds of depositions, several witnesses during the impeachment and trial of President Clinton. 2/ In

Kurt "Masks Save Lives" Eichenwald

kurteichenwald

Dems are correct in not calling witnesses, which is obvious when you think this through. First, the case has been made. Any GOPr or delusional Trump fan who doesnt accept

eli friedmann

eligit

Unpopular opinion:Democrats decision to just cancel this clown show will probably gain them more votes in the midterms than it will lose.If it has any effect at all.Which will, frankly,

Elizabeth de la Vega

Delavegalaw

No need to make this complicated. It's important to call witnesses, but the case can and should be sewn up with surgical precision. @RepRaskin can introduce all the testimony he

Briala Sparris

BrianSpanner1

Nicola Sturgeon rightly pointed out witnesses in the Salmond inquiry should not be sharing information with others.Unfortunately it was in response to a question on why all the civil servants

Alex Stamos

alexstamos

We're going to end up with influencers having one persona for their large normie audience on FB/YT and a much more conspiratorial and aggressive persona for the true believers on

Randall G

RandallGoins1

Now that I had the chance to calm down, here's my thoughts about what happened. Like many of you I'm disappointed with the senate Dem leaders decision to not allow

Jordan Satterfield

jrsatterfield

Christians are living SIGNS OF THE KINGDOM! Lord, will you at this time restore the kingdom to Israel? It is not for you know the times and seasons which the

Greg Olear

gregolear

Just watched House Managers presser:>>Raskin says they only needed Beutler's statement about the McCarthy/Trump call, as that was new. They got it into the record. They got what they wanted.

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.