Read on Twitter
Thread on why you should *not* be angry re no witnesses
1) the GOP vowed to acquit no matter what
2) LeninGraham desperately wants to delay the Merrick Garland confirmation - witnesses does this, with no benefit to Dems
3) We have all the evidence, on tape, in tweet, 1/3
1) the GOP vowed to acquit no matter what
2) LeninGraham desperately wants to delay the Merrick Garland confirmation - witnesses does this, with no benefit to Dems
3) We have all the evidence, on tape, in tweet, 1/3
4) GOP does not care.
5) In law, there's a 'cumulative evidence; rule against slogging out the same proof over and over. We know his guilt, we know the outcome ignoring is guilt
6) You really think Schumer does not know this? that you thought of something he missed? 2/3
5) In law, there's a 'cumulative evidence; rule against slogging out the same proof over and over. We know his guilt, we know the outcome ignoring is guilt
6) You really think Schumer does not know this? that you thought of something he missed? 2/3
7) Maybe, just maybe, Schumer and Raskin are smarter than that/have more info, and think it's better to allow the flood of admissions/stipulations that can be used in a criminal case instead of wasting time (and delaying confirmation hearings) on this guaranteed acquittal. 3/3
8) Ask yourself why, last week, LeninGraham full-on panicked about confirming Garland as AG and now said "wait, let's have 300 witnesses". To delay the hearing.
This trial would always end in "praise trump". Merrick Garland's probe, not so much. Schumer/Raskin won this round.
This trial would always end in "praise trump". Merrick Garland's probe, not so much. Schumer/Raskin won this round.
