#Reviewers

Yogi Jaeger

yoginho

I made the mistake of taking on a grant review in my old field of research. The first this year. Much has happened since January. And many of my priorities

Yehuda Lindell

LindellYehuda

This is going to be an unpopular thread for academic twitter. I'll start by saying that no system is perfect, and the same is true of academia. Furthermore, I am

Thomas G. Dietterich

tdietterich

I've been trying to imagine how the ML research and publication enterprise could be re-organized. Here are some initial thoughts. Feedback welcome! 1/ My proposal has four components. At the

Lindsay Brown

Lidsville

Selected observations on #SiteC from a top internat'l energy expert who doesn't want to be named. "There will never be a functional dam at #SiteC. The L-shape & the half-concrete,

Alex Kidman

alexkidman

Some thoughts (possibly a bit of a rant) on reviewing: The other day, somebody said to me that I was a "harsh" tech reviewer, always looking for faults. (thread) That

Karen Wyld

1KarenWyld

Another night of restless sleep. Do other authors experience this just before their novels are released? Or, more to the point, is being able to sleep at night part of

Jaclyn A. Siegel

jacasiegel

PROPOSAL: Journals hire full-time professional peer reviewers and compensate them equitably. This opens opportunities for folks with PhDs who do not want to be professors, and work can be done

Tasha Suri

tashadrinkstea

Sometimes it takes work to fully engage with a piece of media. If you're a western consumer you may have discovered that to really get the nuances of k-drama or

Dr. Jeff Catalano

jeff_catalano

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, the journal I lead, has retracted three papers for fabrication and falsification of data: https://bit.ly/3088zQ9 , https://bit.ly/3gXA58U , https://bit.ly/374CbiT 1/X I personally handled the

Tony Shield

das_shield

I've been reading a lot of undergrad assignments, postgrad theses, research papers & a book recently. My overwhelming impression is that humans write poorly, so here are some unsolicited tips...

Britt Koskella

bkoskella

I’m seeing some push back today that science is science and we shouldn’t attack a paper that presents valid data. Here’s the thing- science is typically (not always) based on

d. emerson eddy

93418

Most comics critics/reviewers/editorialists/analysts/journalists/whatever you want to call the critical body that generate pages after pages of largely free content, do it out of love for the medium. Many are fans

Russell Buchan

RussellBuchan

As a non-US academic, I was once cautioned about submitting to US law journals as they are not double blind peer reviewed. For a long time, I took this to

Tiffany Leigh

tiffanyleigh

Game reviewers: deploying the "X game *fires* Y game" trope in your reviews is dismissive and disqualifying It's not Thunderdome; multiple games sharing common themes or mechanics can coexist. You're

Kallie Plagge

inkydojikko

I've seen a lot of people saying I was "right" about Cyberpunk and that I must feel vindicated by the backlash toward the game and yes it is fun to

Regina N. Bradley, Ph.D.

redclayscholar

You doing the academic book thing? Dope! A thread.1. Do your homework. Sometimes the most prestigious academic press that (more) established scholars fawn over ain't meant for your research. Peep

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.