#Reviewers

Reza Shokri

rzshokri

The main objective of paper review process is not paper selection. Spoiler alert: It is rather providing an objective technical review of a paper from the viewpoint of an expert.

Helen De Cruz

Helenreflects

Many academics don't seem to know this: It's the editor's job to either reject or accept, or recommend revisions following a peer review report, not the reviewers'. Reviewers give recommendations,

Dr. Jena Barchas-Lichtenstein

drNYCnerd

Inspired by a conversation with @MelissaKrug1 , a thread: things nobody taught me about academic publishing in grad school. (And please add your own tips!) 1. Desk rejections are almost

Ciara Meehan

CA_Meehan

I’ve had a rejection for a journal article that, on reflection, I should never have submitted. The reviewers rightly eviscerated it. Once I got over myself, it was clear that

Arjun Raj

arjunrajlab

Anybody else feel like response to reviewers have gotten longer and longer? Exhausted at the prospect of another 40+ page rebuttal to the collected works of Reviewer 3. A few

Berkubernetus

fuzzychef

1/ So when I say to talk proposal reviewers "you have to make an effort to include demographically diverse speakers" there's often a lot of pushback and confusion. Lemme talk

Jia-Bin Huang

jbhuang0604

My #CVPR2021 review takeaways:*Don’t oversell*The CMT matching system gets pretty good these days. Your reviewers will be knowledgeable in your field. They will not be happy when you downplay their

Laura Portwood-Stacer, PhD (she/her)

lportwoodstacer

Let's talk peer reviews & how to respond to them. This is one of those things in academia that authors learn how to deal with haphazardly and it can really

🥧 SUZANNE 🥧

425suzanne

I'm in a unique position to be extremely knowledgeable and experienced on this topic from all angles, Jason (who doesn't follow me so may not have that context.) This reply

Clelia Gore

MadmoiselleClel

This business is so subjective from end to end--from the first gatekeeper onward to readers. I can see from a writer's perspective that it's hard to know whether your manuscript

Dr. Samira A.Rahimi

RahimiSamira

In this thread, I am sharing some #GrantWriting tips from my reviewer's perspective (as I spent most of this month's evenings & weekends reviewing grant proposals for (inter)national agencies) Hope

Daniel Zappala

Daniel_Zappala

Having been a reviewer for USENIX Security, CCS, PETS, and ACSAC, I’ve observed both good and bad reviewing practices. We’re grappling with massive growth in security conferences, and this is

Travis Chi Wing Lau (劉志頴)

travisclau

As a book review editor and reviewer myself, it has been just appalling to me that certain presses are refusing to send hard copies to reviewers even after those reviewers

Christy Avery

Christy_Avery

Writing a #grant or contemplating a grant? Here is my "top 10" list of mistakes, developed through a lot of blood, sweat, tears (many tears), applications, diverse study section service,

Emmett Macfarlane

EmmMacfarlane

Since I'm working on this at the moment, a short 'advice thread' for dealing with peer review at the R&R stage. So: what do you do when dealing with a

Dr. Jessica Sowa

sowa75

Little thread on publishing. What I have learned being an editor....#AcademicTwitter Reviewers are people and are not always right. I have had reviewers all suggest a manuscript should be accepted

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.