#Legal

Jeff Crisp

JFCrisp

UK:Good to see the growing momentum behind the 'safe and legal routes to asylum' movement. But I fear that we will struggle to make much of an impact on government

Gavin Hales

gmhales

'Rape victims speak out ahead of legal challenge to CPS policy'https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/jan/26/victims-speak-out-ahead-of-legal-challenge-to-cps-policy-rape?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tweet It's striking that this lega

Liam Spender

LiamSpender

1/4 The government is trying to justify #forcedloans because they say it create space to enable those responsible to be “pursued” via legal action. In most buildings more than 6

Kearnan Myall

kearnanmyall

I fear we’re only going to see more cases like this in the future - it’s something I’m hugely concerned about for myself as much as anything. Equally torn between

Jack Shepherd

jackwshepherd

Seeing lots of divergent views of lawyer training / legal change that I think are based on different understandings of what a “lawyer” is. Some think a lawyer/legal work is

Parker Molloy

ParkerMolloy

“Trump’s going to be dragged out by the Secret Service. We have a little thing called THE CONSTITUTION” takes are just unbelievably, willfully naive. The plan isn’t to just let

Sanjukta Paul

sanjuktampaul

Did classical economics have an indigenous theory of property as such? Ie, prescribing actual property rules in one way or another? Did it hew to Locke in any meaningful sense?

Afsana

afsanalachaux

I’m facing a £94K legal bill after a UK judge backed a divorce ruling by sharia judges in Dubai, rather than a French Supreme Court judgment which said the Dubai

Matt Steilen

MJSteilen

On the occasion of this piece of satire, which hits pretty close to home: here's my impression of what happened to Fed Soc. It's just an impression--correct me where I'm

Ari Paul ⛓️

AriDavidPaul

A lot of right leaning thought leaders are saying unironically, "show me a single example of structural racism." We still have a lot of miscommunication around the term "racism." Many

Leanne

MsLods

"During the debate, the Opposition labelled interception ‘an outrageous and unjustified intrusion into and interference with the private lives of Australian citizens’." (1960, Edward Ward, ALP) I'm reading Chapter 26

Catherine Rampell

crampell

How the Trump administration is turning legal immigrants into undocumented ones -- by, uhh, literally turning off the printers that print the documentshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-the-trump-administration-is-turning-legal-imm

Taeyong NCT ☆ SuperM

taeyong1st

An established principle of law is that only the injured party has the cause of action to file a case. So as the artist's agency, SM has no legal standing

DocBrooke (She/Her)

EBPhipps

I've been seeing a lot of discussion about the Beer Hall Putsch of 1923, in which the Nazi party staged a similar coup attempt to what we saw in Washington

Palmer Report

PalmerReport

Judge Sullivan has dismissed the Michael Flynn case. That’s just a formality after the pardon. What matters is what Sullivan ends up saying in his dismissal about how the pardon

Eddie Clark

Publicwrongs

Had a good student paper this sem on the legal effects of the stalled bill to change NZ's regime for birth certificate changes to a self-ID model.One of the most

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.