#Scotus

Jonathan Ladd

jonmladd

The false but popular notion that all the original writers of the Constitution had conservative and inegalitarian views depends crucially on ignoring Reconstruction, and being able to trust that most

Rewire News Group

RewireNewsGroup

Well hello! It's me! @AngryBlackLady! Fancy meeting you over here!Ready to talk Donald Trump and the Supreme Court? Oh you are? Perfect. Yesterday, Donald Trump took to the podium to,

Mark Halperin

MarkHalperin

A lot people you will hear over the next day are invested in an overtime election &, despite what they say, they can't imagine giving up @realDonaldTrump 1 day sooner

Gabriel Malor

gabrielmalor

Last night SCOTUS held that California may not put a flat ban on indoor worship, but may impose a 25% capacity limitation, masking, distancing rules, and a singing ban. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a136_bq7c.pdfJustice

enough is enough

EmilyGorcenski

So if GA and PA go today, here's what I'm looking out for in terms of election nonsense from the Trump Campaign, along with my assessment of whether it's likely

David Hogg

davidhogg111

MAGA want to talk about censorship?-Let’s talk about the 30,000,000+ Californians that only have two senators-Talk about the 3,000,000+ Puerto Ricans without basically any real representation -Talk about the number

Adam J. Fein

DrugChannels

1/8Re: Rutledge v. @pcmanet decision by @scotus https://drugch.nl/3mnpDJv My $0.02: A huge win for independent retail #pharmacy against #PBMs. Congrats!For your consideration: Some unintended consequences as #PBMs and payers react 2/8M

Jay Fivekiller

JayFiveK

1/ Regarding Bill Barr's comments: In his favor, it takes a long time to develop a complex federal criminal case, especially if you're working backward from statistical anomalies toward the

#SOULWAR ✝

CatesDuane

Thread: An article by @DBCopa that lays out WHY the Texas SCOTUS Case is a Game Changer & what President Trump was angling for from the beginning= https://dbcoparanis.medium.com/the-texas-2020-election-case-and-the-supreme-court-eee260a

Blake E. Reid

blakereid

This is an interesting thread, but I’m not sure I agree with this frame. When it comes to mass media, we’ve always mediated access through sui generis regimes with very

Courtney Milan 🦖

courtneymilan

I worked with Josh Hawley for a year. He seemed like a nice guy, which just goes to show you that our civility norms need to be less about whether

Nigel Carlsbad

pompilivs

Fun case: in 1949, Frank Buchanan (D-PA) was appointed chair of the Select Committee on Lobbying Activities, which investigated anti-New Deal conservatives, among others. One of their targets was Edward

Machiavelli

TheRISEofROD

Communist China has infiltrated both Democrat & Republican parties, Hollywood, Academia, Propaganda Media & released their virus to the world with the help of those institutions.We're NOT going to allow

Hansi Lo Wang

hansilowang

NEW: As expected, the Supreme Court has overturned lower court rulings out of California & Maryland that had blocked Trump's census apportionment memo. The liberal justices dissent, as they did

Aaron J. Carpenter🇺🇸

aaronjcarpenter

2) SCOTUS will simply rule the election is invalid due to countrywide Voter Fraud, and at that point it will be sent to the US House and US Senate for

Diala Shamas

dialash

Today, the Supreme Court sided with our Muslim clients, finding that they can pursue their demands for damages from FBI agents who harassed them and tried to coerce them to

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.