#Procedural

Akiva Cohen

AkivaMCohen

The Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a ruling today on its voting rules. No, not the Trump case. The pre-existing case about absentee voting. Lets do a live-read. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3

Weltgeist on Horseback🌎👻🏇🏻

rhizostigmata

Social machines such as our political system function by feeding on the contradictions they give rise to, the crises they provoke—"No one has ever died from contradictions. And the more

Don Zeko

Don_Zeko

I've got a bit of downtime, so I hope y'all are ready for a thread about procedural bullshit and how my morning in court went. The procedural questions here involve

Benoy Shah MD

dr_benoy_n_shah

Just published in #JACCMulti-centre propensity score-matched observational study from the Redo-TAVR registry (initiated in Feb '19) comparing TAVI-in-TAVI versus TAVI-in-SAVR!A thread exploring this paper... 37 centres performed 63,876

M A Gaylor 🍑 🆘

MamaGaylor

1/6 Hey @JoeManchinWV and @SenatorSinema: Please tell us all again why you think we should keep the filibuster? You actually think there are 10 Senate GOP willing to boost your

Kokila Annamalai

Kokilaparvathi

In his Ministerial Statement on the Parti Liyani case, K Shanmugam pointed to inconsistencies in Parti's statements, and between her statements and her testimony in court, multiple times. This has

David Rothkopf

djrothkopf

Important, on the money piece by @ThePlumlineGS. McConnell has revealed himself to be who we knew he was. He will obstruct. Dems must, to begin with, break the current logjam

Matt Glassman

MattGlassman312

I am still of the mind that the Dems/Congress made a series of strategic errors on 1/6 regarding impeachment. I'm not really blaming them---these were very weighty decisions that would

Matt Zwolinski

Mattzwolinski

Hot take: Bentham is seriously underrated by libertarians. Part of the problem is that economists don’t read history, and philosophers who do know Bentham mainly by his terrible efforts at

Trevor Purdy

TrevorsIdeas

Poilievre and the CPC refuse to accept any "truth" that doesn't fit their narrative. They ignore dissenting opinion and facts. They repeat questions. They badger. With that in mind does

Michael Baharaeen

mbaharaeen

This isn't totally surprising behavior from Republicans, but then it also is in some ways. Biden has been reluctant to call for Senate Dems to nuke the filibuster, but if

Heidi N. Moore

moorehn

I'll tell you what Dems like Pelosi will say and for once they'll be right:To remove him two weeks before he leaves office will strengthen white supremacist beliefs. Force makes

Sam Rosenfeld

sam_rosenfeld

I'm just a simple country professor but it seems to me that both sides of Letter Discourse have reached consensus that "free speech" & abstract procedural principles are red herrings

H. Brian Holland

Prof_Holland

Just finished listening to oral arguments in the @realDonaldTrump campaign's latest federal action, feat. @RudyGiuliani, and I won't necessarily rehash the whole thing but I have few of thoughts ...

Chad Pergram

ChadPergram

1) The House of Representatives today will debate and vote on its version of the police reform bill. We expect debate on the measure in the mid-afternoon with a vote

sarah maria griff

griffski

when we talk about ~commercial fiction versus ~literary fiction we are really talking about notions of ‘low art’ and ‘high art’ and honestly, we should be past those dichotomies by

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.