#Precedent

Matt Glassman

MattGlassman312

A funny thing about essentially unprecedented situations: *somehow* this decision got made, we may or may not ever know how or by who, and in 100 years from this will

Has Jeff Bezos Decided To End World Hunger?

HasBezosDecided

I'll not mourn Trump's suspension from Twitter, but I will say this is setting a very dangerous precedent that will come back and bite the left. They've just suspended the

WAPS of the Palisades

sumdepony

There are three major left-wing positions on Trump's banning1. Jubilation2. Concern that it sets a precedent3. Feigned indifference(1/5) Jubilation is wrong cause a crack down on "extremism" including us, will

Amy Siskind 🏳️‍🌈

Amy_Siskind

It's not that Trump will get away with it.It's that he is committing sedition in broad daylight and not a single Republican is speaking out.Time for Biden to stop with

Sigrid Ellis

sigridellis

The fact that it is illegal.The fact that there is no legal authority for this action.The fact that there are checks and balances to prevent it.The fact that there is

Ari Fleischer

AriFleischer

Two years from now, or 20 years, or 50 years, another President will act in a way that enrages his/her opposition and impeachment will be sought. Every day, every hour

Brian The Great

BrianTh37895972

I see a lot of people getting excited over the Trump legal team led by @RudyGiuliani filing a new PA suit with SCOTUS and it being placed on the docket.

Thomas Berry

Thomas_A_Berry

Yesterday was my last day serving as a federal appellate law clerk. I’m incredibly grateful for the rare opportunity to get this “behind the scenes” view, and I learned a

Brittney Cooper

ProfessorCrunk

Cruz is now citing the 1876 election as precedent for this madness. The Hayes-Tilden compromise ended Reconstruction after the Civil War by giving the GOP the presidency in exchange for

Kevin Collins

kwcollins

People (most recently, today's The Daily, but they are far from alone) keep talking about Senate rules (e.g. the Filibuster Rule) as if they are constraining precedent. This is inaccurate,

Jim Sciutto

jimsciutto

Don’t miss this: After all the talk about the US military defying Trump’s demand to deploy regular troops, strikes me DHS has now provided virtually the same: federal agents in

Steven Portnoy

stevenportnoy

I was just asked a good Q on @KYWNewsradio. Why is the Senate voting again on the question of jurisdiction in the impeachment trial, if it already decided the matter

Emir Suljagić

suljagicemir1

1. There's really no precedent for what we're trying to do at @SrebrenicaMC & BiH in European history. The European way of dealing with mass murder/genocide is forgetting. This is

Arturo Portilla

Arturo_P_A

Thread:While the entire US crypto industry (exchanges, funds, associations, PsPs, lobbyists, etc) is currently focused on fighting the AML rules proposed by FinCEN, the XRP Community has been left ALONE

The Hoarse Whisperer

TheRealHoarse

Right now, there are tens of thousands of people who fully believed:1) the scumbags were actually the good guys2) the good guys were criminals3) the scumbag heroes were going to

Frances Weetman

francesweetman

I’ve historically sided with free speech liberals and nothing has changed in my beliefs. I think it’s important the state cannot act as a gatekeeper for what is considered acceptable

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.