#Political

Dan Pfeiffer

danpfeiffer

Beating Trump has been the organizing principle for the progressive universe for the last four years. With that goal accomplished, what should we prioritize? How should we invest our time/resources?

Blair Minchin

Mr_Minchin

Teacher Voice.The purpose of education, for me, is twofold: enabling children to find their voice and giving them a meaningful purpose for which to use it.Modelling this is one of

Roger Misso

RogerMissoCNY

The military is a profession. So is teaching. So is pipefitting.We trust professionals to do their jobs without partisan bias.In the political sphere, however, this apolitical expectation should not be

Josh Marshall

joshtpm

I will say it: I’ve always been addicted to polls. Long before rcp and nate and all the rest of them I was a polling addict. But I keep seeing

Michael Sozan 🌊

michaelsozan

Thread.I wrote an op-ed published today in California's Mercury News, discussing how it's time to stop runaway political spending by foreign-influenced U.S. corporations. California's Proposition 22, which just passed, is

Akshay Alladi

akshayalladi

Reforms often involves concentrated costs, diffused benefits. Also the benefits rarely have direct attribution. Politically that means they are a net loser. If a reform has unanimity it is often

🦑✨🦑HAPPY NEW SQUID!🦑✨🦑

RainbowSquidInk

I have a good ass reason why I hate people who force politics and that's because I was already caught up in that shit after so high horse lady tried

Gloria Purvis

gloria_purvis

If you think a discussion of manifest grave sin of public figures only applies to your “political enemies” then you are missing the fact that the demands of the faith

Cory Clark

ImHardcory

1. Here's a New Year's Resolution: More tolerance toward political opponentsDems and Reps tend to caricature one another (see example below from https://perceptiongap.us )Our opponents really are not as extreme, homogeneous,

Mike Hill

michaeldoron

I think a key issue in history teaching at large is how we can finally break away from organising curricula around political (or worse, constitutional) history.There is no reason why

Seth Cotlar

SethCotlar

Nope. Nope-ity nope nope. Nope-erino. Nope to the nope power.https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1323676485119430661 No passes for these cowards who stood by silently while the leader of their party openly sought to shred the

Saoirse McHugh

saoirse_mchugh

Using historical deaths to get a dig in at SF isn’t the show of respect that you imagine...You think the families of the dead are like “oh well thank god

Drew Medaris

SoterioPolitics

The future of political evangelicalism is the hot topic post-Trump. But I wonder if the evangelical talk says more about the evangelical elite and their influence. People like Robert Jeffress

Farooq Tirmizi

FarooqTirmizi

I must confess I do not understand the appeal of Mr Chomsky. But he came up in the context of one of the more annoying interviews I have ever had

𝕷'𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍𝖎𝖉𝖚𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖘𝖘𝖊 𝖑𝖊 𝖛𝖊𝖚𝖑𝖙

SalemLola

It is always very strange for me to listen to the discourse about ‘representation’ re politics or power in general, because I never grew up thinking I needed to have

Seth Cotlar

SethCotlar

1. As we talk about the #MAGABomber and the meaning of his actions, I think it would help if we kept in mind a concept that historians have been discussing

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.