#Reviewers

Daniel Bolnick

DanielBolnick

I've been asked on occasion, "How does someone get to be an Associate Editor for a journal like @ASNAmNat ?" Here's a brief thread explaining: 1) It's okay to tell

Brandon O'Brien should be writing... 🃏✒️🎲✨🌌

therisingtithes

I will say this about [the thing]: being confused by the middle of a series & judging it harshly because you didn’t read the first book is the odd double-edged

Fernanda Ferreira

fernandaedi

Inspired by @IrisVanRooij, I want to express some concerns that may be controversial and even outrageous to some but I feel we at least should have a discussion. I'm wondering

Ebony Elizabeth Thomas

Ebonyteach

Academic journal editor here. It’s our job to read, interpret & then write to the article author advising them about how to revise. (One past editor taught us at the

Greg Downey

GregDowney1

Seen a lot of criticism of journal editors in my Twitter feed for (gasp!) sending out invitations to review articles over the holidays. You all do realise that most editors

Pieter Borger

BorgerPieter

Another bad day for science.Three days ago, we asked the editorial board of Eurosurveillance for the status of our external peer review, which we submitted on Nov 27 last year.

Michael Breakspear

DrBreaky

How to revise:As an editor and author I have seen many revised papers return to journals. Given effort, most go well (ie step toward acceptance). Some go pear-shaped. I’ve slowly

Anne Tibbets 🚀👻☠️🏰🏹🔪

AnneTibbets

What to do if you are a writer and you receive a negative book review on GoodReads/NetGalley/Amazon/etc. etc. etc.:Step 1: DO NOT post ANY response on social media or reply

Josh Kertzer

jkertzer

Warning! This is a thread about academic inside baseball. Let's call it Sherlock Holmes and The Case of the Missing IR Articles. As others on here (including @sbmitche @smsaideman @drkristawiegand

masha gessen

mashagessen

I avoided the topic of pronouns for a while, but when my new book was coming out, it seemed I had to make a decision about self-presentation. I am trans*,

Haidee Kotze

HaideeKotze

I’ve seen lots of indignant tweets on #AcademicTwitter about receiving review requests from journals over the holidays. Here are some reflections, from a journal editor (who is also an author,

Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega

raulpacheco

THREAD: On the full-fledged process of responding to a Revise-And-Resubmit (R&R). I have written pieces of the process, but I hadn't actually written a thread or a blog post showcasing

Emily M. Bender

emilymbender

I've now read Yuan, Liu and @gneubig 's paper "Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?" https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.00176 ... and of course I have a few things to say: /1 I'd like to start

Koraly Pérez-Edgar 🇵🇷

Dr_Koraly

A review of 2020 reviews & a of jumbled thoughts:Ad-hoc Review requests received: 109Requests accepted: 37Action Editor ms for J1: 35Action Editor ms for J2: 86Thoughts on the current state

LusKing Lab

LuskingL

@MarkELindsay asked about my thoughts on good practices and common pitfalls for F31/F32s.1. The innovation and impact of the science is not evaluated like an R grant. This is hard

Dolly Kikon

DollyKikon

@antipodeonline In 2018 Jason Con and Michael Ellenberg edited a book "Frontier Assemblages". My chapter review was brutal. I was not good enough for the edited series. My work was

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.