#Speech

Julian Sanchez

normative

Parler’s content guidelines appear to be written to make it misleadingly look like wholly discretionary aspects of their moderation policy are legally required. Like most platforms they plan to “censor”

Nodutdol | 노둣돌

nodutdol

South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha was grilled on CNN recently about South Korea’s new anti-leaflet law. What is the anti-leaflet law, and why is this issue being elevated by

Aleks Samoylov

Aleks_S

"Well, if you're allowed to criticize America without getting jailed, so it can't be all that bad" isn't the rhetorical coup that you think it is.The US has gotten away

"Just the facts, ma'am. Just the facts."

markmair

1/ @HumzaYousaf with the greatest respect can I suggest that you watch the movie ‘The Lives of Others’ about the East German government's surveillance of a writer suspected of ‘wrong

The Original Straw Smuggler

ethebuilder

Folks if you think the Internet Overlords are going be satisfied with simply canceling conservative speech you are sadly mistaken. The great purge includes gun websites and any other form

Yuan Yi Zhu

yuanyi_z

Interesting story, though I note that Geoffrey Howe disclosed what happened to the House of Commons in... 1975 in what The Guardian chose to describe as "a previously unnoticed speech".https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/

Tony Burke

Tony_Burke

I’ve never seen this before. The govt voted against one of its own ministers speaking. We just had the votes on Labor’s amendments to the National Redress Scheme. @LindaBurneyMP moved

Jacob Gunter 甘杰克

Jacob_T_Gunter

Late to the dissection of Xi's Davos 2.0 speech, but here are some observations - THREAD: As I listened, I noted how unsurprising the content was. It was aligned with

Lim Wei Jiet 🇲🇾

limweijiet

This decision has chilling consequences on media freedom & free speech in Malaysia. Here's why:1. Msiakini was in contempt for 3rd party comments disparaging the Judiciary on its website. FC

Terri Kopp

TerriKopp2it

CONSERVATIVES. Can we talk about the First Amendment please? Lesson #1. It applies to government entities, NOT private people or corporations. If I don’t like what you say, I can

Elliot Harmon

elliotharmon

I've said it before: I don't really remember where I was when Snowden happened, but I sure do remember where I was when the CDA happened (25 years ago today).

Bob From Brockley 🥤

bobfrombrockley

A thread on free speech absolutists who defend fascists, prompted by Glenn Greenwald saying that Joe Rogan having once recommended a YouTube video of Noam Chomsky proves he has nothing

Adam Thierer

AdamThierer

um, no. This revisionist history of the "golden age" of broadcast regulation & the Fairness Doctrine ignores the troubling history of FCC speech controls & unintended consequences of regulation. That

David Rothkopf

djrothkopf

Fatuous. Based on a fallacy. Indefensible. David Brooks once again complains from his protected perch at the NYT that right-wingers like him have been silenced...then lists ways in which they

Lindsay Ellis

thelindsayellis

I don't believe that all of the people who signed that Harper's letter are the flavor of rich white person who is mad they're getting dragged for bad Twitter opinions

StockChartArt

CasualtyWar

Facebook, Twitter, Google, Apple, etc. all acting in concert. Companies that collectively control the information flow for 3 billion peopleCompanies, without which, modern life is impossible.These companies have just announced

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.