#Moderation

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

rasmus_kleis

On Trump & platforms: A decision can be welcome and still illustrate problematic situation3 Qs. 1) Consistent enforcement? Companies are often wildly inconsistent in when, where, who they enforce against.

(((Aaron “Worthing” Walker)))

AaronWorthing

Here’s the problem with the “they can publish whatever they want” argument. Let’s talk about other contexts.Thread.Have you ever gone to an office supply store to purchase printer ink and

Josh Constine - SignalFire

JoshConstine

I asked 6 moderation experts to debate the tradeoffs of deplatforming Trump.The conclusion? Banishing him to fringe apps makes his extremist followers tougher to trackBut the bigger threat is on

🌹Shahid Buttar for Congress

ShahidForChange

The discussion over @Twitter suspending Trump seems to have skipped a few beats.Thread. /1 Only the state is (even theoretically) obligated to respect constitutional rights. Corporate platforms are not bound

Daphne Keller

daphnehk

Assorted observations on the #DSA. These track my own interests, so if you want an overview, look elsewhere. (If I see one, I’ll add it to the thread though.) 1/https://twitter.com/daphnehk/status/1338885153142128642

💡 Scott | The Ten Ideas Practitioner

ttipractitioner

As requested by @MyBetaMod:Ten ways to love yourself.[A thread] 1. Develop a daily gratitude practice.There are many ways to do so. This post has one of my favourite methods:https://www.scottswhite.com/posts/daily-gratitude-practice 2.

Evan Greer

evan_greer

In the last two weeks I have heard at least half a dozen full hour NPR segments about deplatforming and not one has included a single sex worker, Palestine activist,

Tiffany C. Li

tiffanycli

Unpopular opinion: The Facebook Oversight Board is not that interesting. The Oversight Board is not a Supreme Court. They’re not making or interpreting law. Facebook is not a government. The

@[email protected]

_dev_urandom_

cw: politics, social mediathe mastodon/fediverse model of social media isn't perfect, but it probably has the best balance between "free speech" and public safety.you wanna build an "everything goes" instance?

Berin Szóka 🌐

BerinSzoka

No, political bias in content moderation doesn't violate #antitrust (or consumer protection) laws, even if rivals coordinated to do it, because websites have a First Amendment right to decide what

Ahab Bdaiwi איהאבּ ܐܝܗܐܒ

bdaiwi_historia

1/Following up on an interesting point raised by Jonathan AC Brown about Avicenna & wine-drinking, I'd like to offer a few cursory remarks. One: Avicenna drank wine. His penchant for

kevinhash

kevinhash

the challenge of processing politics through a Christian worldview is that news comes pre-marinated in a secular (progressive/conservative) worldview. And there is Christless-progressivism AND Christless-conservatism. But when its what we

Jess Miers

jess_miers

If you care about the Internet, free expression, and user generated content, you should be *really upset* with the latest attempt to reform #Section230 via a must-pass defense spending bill.

Kat Walsh

mindspillage

I started writing a few tweets but then it turned in to Section 230 braindump time; strap in, everybody. So, I had no intentions of being a lawyer and I

Dr. Sarah T. Roberts

ubiquity75

I once a had a major Silicon Valley figure/leader look me in the face and tell me, “I only pay attention to quantitative research.” At first, I took that as

Tom London

TomLondon6

Sir Keir Starmer is the only Labour MP - there are a number of Tory MPs - who is a member of the Trilateral Commission. A current member is Kissinger

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.