#Critique

KatieQuixotic

katiequixotic

Okay soAmidst the whole country being swallowed by fascism, I think this might be, in comparison, a small concern; however, it's been weighing heavily on my mind, so I think

Kate Derickson

katederickson

A few more thoughts on the NSF announcement. 1/I am not surprised that *just* as we see the emergence of the field of Black Geographies, which fundamentally challenges epistemologies of

Authentic Black Girl

NatashaMLee

I dislike discussing & learning about racial justice in classrooms with YT ppl. The learning is often too uni-directional. I feel that my education is often placed on hold so

Sophie B Hawkins VEVO

tonyahardingjr

Here's the thing about The Professor Is In, and I will truly leave it at that: academia is the greatest constant source of untapped--and frankly, failed--labor solidarity and power that

Jorge Amigo

AmigoJor

As someone who worked for WE Charity in the past, I cannot believe it's taken the press, school boards, and the general public so long to start questioning this charity/business.

Thomas Hackett (escaping for Advent)

tradtom

Got around to reading this piece. It's a good critique of Vermeule's 'integralism'. It points out that he fails to engage with liberalism in the mindset of the Church (for

Bronze Age Pervert

bronzeagemantis

Academics and journalists on here steal the creative content of anons, give no attribution...but worse, they SANITIZE it. For example: the Bureaucrat repopularized Lasch, as well as Cuddihy, many other

ChloeCarterArts

ChloeCarterArts

A few people expressed an interest in this, so let's try it! Art Critique Share EITHER• Post ONE artwork you want specific advice onOR• Post FOUR pieces for more general

James Meadway

meadwaj

@joecguinan response to Starmer's speech is partly defence of "Corbynomics" as embodying an institutional critique of neoliberalism I mostly agree with, but three further points to make:https://tribunemag.co.uk/2021/02/the-unb

MJ Tiako

MaxJordan_N

Quote tweeting this into a mini thread because it’s worth sharing with the TL. You shouldn’t fear critiquing a study publicly. It’s part of scientific discourse. How u do it

John S. Olson

pilotolson

A thread on some back-of-the-envelope reflections on the "worst-case scenario" of overheating the economy and inflation: Starting assumptions are1. The CBO has the output gap right2. A very generous (linear)

Ubaka Ogbogu

UbakaOgbogu

A fellow academic wrote to me yesterday "too many [in government] dismiss [my] commentary as divorced from the reality of the public policy process." This is a type of muzzling

⚓️🚢Imani Gandy 🚢⚓️

AngryBlackLady

every politician is going to disappoint at some point or another. the key is to be as fierce an advocate as possible without being a perennially negative jackass. it's the

Valentin Amrhein

vamrhein

I think we should start most papers with "How does Y change in response to X?" (or correlate with X) rather than "Does Y change in response to X?" Thanks

Marc Scheff (he/him)

marcscheff

I’m an artist and hire them, and worked on tech design teams, so I’ve been on both sides of the critique table. A good critique is a two-way street that

Sarah Pinsker

SarahPinsker

.@dongwon and @ninocipri make great points. How do you find writing community, though? In a non-distanced world, you might be lucky enough (and have time enough, and transportation) to find

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.