#Appellate

Thomas Berry

Thomas_A_Berry

Yesterday was my last day serving as a federal appellate law clerk. I’m incredibly grateful for the rare opportunity to get this “behind the scenes” view, and I learned a

Jed Blackwell

JedBlackwell

Woke up with something on my mind, which is dangerous. A mini-thread:There’s a lot of heat on the SCHSL after yesterday’s non-decision on the Lexington plan by the Appellate Panel.

Matthew Stiegler

MatthewStiegler

6 good books for appellate lawyers:- Winning Brief, Garner- Supreme Court & Appellate Advocacy, Frederick- Sense of Structure, Gopen- Dreyer's English- Storycraft, Hart- Typography for Lawyers, ButterickIf you're in CA3,

Joel Trachtman

JPTrachtman

Some comments on this op-ed. 1. The WTO is not “a person”. It is an international agreement that we and others made. The organization itself has only the tiniest powers.

Raffi Melkonian

RMFifthCircuit

So I have an #AppellateTwitter tale for you. Here is a recent appellate court describing a familiar appellate rule. Except I know that this is not right. Or at least,

Simon Lester

snlester

This new WSJ op-ed (https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-to-set-world-trade-straight-11597966341) by Lighthizer repeats a lot of his previous talking points, but let me offer a couple thoughts. 1/ First, he correctly points out the protectionis

Hannah Mullen

hannnahmmarie

My 2020 reflection: towards the end of law school and during my clerkship, I became increasingly bummed about the dissonance between my professional goals (raw ambition, be as fancy and

Elizabeth Bingham

SeekJustice117

Here in Texas we really need to have a long conversation about Sections 273.081 and 273.61 of the Texas Election Code - what is the practical point of these statutes

Todd N. Tucker

toddntucker

Philip Morris challenged Australia's anti-smoking laws and lost, in what may be the WTO Appellate Body's final decision.I read the gargantuan 1,264-page panel report and 327-page appellate report so you

Michael Plaxton

MichaelPlaxton

I'd like to read the cases in more depth before I say anything too definitive on this, but I have some preliminary thoughts.https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-supreme-court-sends-signal-to-appeal-courts-to-overturn-seven-rul

Jonathan Turley

JonathanTurley

Any appellate decision taking unprecedented measures to stop “irreparable harms” and “irregular” conduct is newsworthy. However, those admonishments were not describing Flynn's conduct but that of his trial judge, U.S.

Mike Sacks

MikeSacksEsq

Because we all know it’s “the left & their partners in the legacy media” that control what cases SCOTUS chooses to hear, not the justices themselves on a court that’s

Jaime Santos

Jaime_ASantos

For law students and general practitioners wondering what a DIG is--it means the Court is dismissing a case as improvidently granted. It essentially is like returning a sweater you thought

Emilia Decaudin 🏳️‍⚧️🥀

EmiliaDecaudin

I'm here at the @Queens_Dems Judicial Convention with @julia_forman, @MiriamBensman, @HeatherEBD, and my colleagues in the Democratic Party.You might be wondering—what is a Judicial Convention? What are Judicial Delegates? Here

Luke Ryan

LukeRyanLawMA

@rahsaandhall, @Dan_McF & @segalmr have been sharing incredibly thoughtful posts on the many substantive problems with #QualifiedImmunity. Do yourself a favor & check them out. This Thread tackles procedural problems

Jim Layton

JimLaytonMO

This action by https://twitter.com/Eric_Schmitt (https://twitter.com/Eric_Schmitt/status/1285350569977274369) is a truly extraordinary act by an attorney general—at least by a Missouri AG. If there is a precedent (and I doubt that t

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.