#Methodological

Doug Rand

doug_rand

So many excellent journalists give non-credible anti-immigrant groups an uncritical platform for saying up is down.Here's @JessicaV_CIS claiming the Trump admin wants to *protect* children by letting them languish in

Hannah Lebovits

HannahLebovits

OKAY! I'm up next for #PAScholarStrike! Were going to talk about one of my favorite topics: research methods. And how our views on "research" and "rigor" create massive inequities in

Henning Strandin

HenningStrandin

1/25A great and thought-provoking thread by @EpiEllie about current science skepticism and its proper explanation. This is what I've mainly been interested in for the last 6 months. Let's talk

Jan Christoph Steckel

jan_c_steckel

Two recent meta-analysis of the ex-post literature on #CarbonPricing (by @greenprofgreen & @JLilliestam etal) suggest carbon pricing is not effectively reducing emissions. This might be both a premature and misleading

Kevin McKernan 🙂

Kevin_McKernan

When respected Scientists resign over the false narrative... Take notice... and thank them.Google Translated Letter fromProf. Dr. Thomas Aigner, Department of Geosciences, University of Tuebingen, Sigwartstrasse 10,D-72076 Tuebingen Germany

Dr. Limor Raviv 🦄🐘🦒

Limor_Raviv

What is the role of network structure in shaping the grammar of languages?In a new paper with Antje Meyer and @shirilevari, we tested this question using a group communication experiment.

Teague Henry

TeagueRHenry

A longer thread on replicability vs asymptotics of network psychometric methods: Recently, I've been seeing both tweets and articles which discuss if network psychometric methods are "replicable". I wanted to

Nils Gilman

nils_gilman

My own view is that gradualism followed by a final exclamation point is a very likely extinction scenario, both for dinosaurs — and for humans. Indulge me in long thread

Kieran Pender

KieranPender

Thread: Tomorrow, the @HighCourtofAus will deliver judgment in Comcare v Banerji (@LaLegale). It is one of the most important free speech (implied freedom of political communication) cases to be determined

Jelena Brankovic

jelena3121

We talk a lot about rankings here: what we think & how we feel about them, why we (dis)like them, what’s wrong with them, and so on.In this I

The Bills make Dr. Jennifer Sessions want to shout

Laprofmme

Kathryn Edwards & @DavidSm54263703 confirm that women do disproportionate amounts of labor of reviewing, ed board work, @HFranceWebsite volunteering. Our male colleagues need to say Yes when asked to do

D. S. Nelson

process_x

You shouldn't seek to prove your hypotheses right. *If you're a scientist, you should only seek to prove them wrong.* This is widely accepted & has been naturalized long enough

Dr. Simon ツ

goddeketal

1/ I am an editor of a @SpringerNature journal and I will give you some more insights into scientific peer-review processes and why fraudulent manipulation with respect to @c_drosten's PCR

Dr. Janet Frick 🍑💙

jfrickuga

Dear psychology colleagues... it's really (past) time for us to have a serious reckoning about the Stanford Prison Experiment. There's not enough useful for us to keep it in our

ReSisters United UK & Ireland

ReSistersU

BBC news bulletin on the rolling out of the vaccine - explaining why they have confidence in it. Phrases like “methodologically sound, scientifically rigorous” “working to strict guidelines on safety

Instructor Florence Ashley

ButNotTheCity

Since Abigail Shrier is promoting the unsupported hypothesis of ‘rapid-onset gender dysphoria’ in her new book, let’s talk about why it’s wrong. I will be basing this off my recent

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.