Whenever a journalist feels compelled to quote @CIS_org as an opposing viewpoint, then at the very least, readers should get more context than "a think tank that promotes greater restrictions on immigration."

Here are some factual alternatives...

2/
I'm sure there are any number of other factual descriptors that would give readers due notice that they are not reading a quote from a reputable research organization.

9/9
You can follow @doug_rand.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.