Toggle navigation
TWunroll
TWunroll
faq
Contact US
#Gorsuch
Mark R. Levin
marklevinshow
1. This is a strange title and as applies to me, and not accurate substantively, either. My criticism of Gorsuch is substantive. His written opinion is extremely deceitful -- a
Read more
Andrew Feinberg
AndrewFeinberg
NEW: The fact @realDonaldTrump thinks his conservative judicial appointees will save him shows he doesn’t have a clue who they are or what they believe about the law, say former
Read more
Sister Helen Prejean
helenprejean
NEWS: The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled that Oklahoma prosecutors cannot try Native Americans in state courts for crimes committed on tribal lands, upholding the sovereignty of the Creek Nation
Read more
Scott Lemieux
LemieuxLGM
McGrit v. OK isn't about what federal law means per se; it was about whether white majorities can nullify clear legal commitments to indigenous people by refusing to honor them.
Read more
Liz Sepper
lsepper
Last night, the Supreme Court largely sided with South Bay United Pentecostal Church, permitting indoor gathering and worship but keeping in place attendance caps and bans on indoor singing. Lots
Read more
Varad Mehta
varadmehta
Breaking: Supreme Court holds firing transgender workers VIOLATES Title VII. BREAKING: Supreme Court applies Title VII to gay and transgender workers. LOLOLOLOL: Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion. Trump is done.
Read more
Sean T at RCP
SeanTrende
If you're going to opine on the Roman Catholic Diocese opinion, do yourself a favor and read the actual per curiam opinion, and not just Gorsuch's (non-binding, solo) concurrence. In
Read more
Gregg Gonsalves
gregggonsalves
You can @ me all you want, but #Gorsuch's "science" in ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN, NEW YORK v. ANDREW M. CUOMO, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK is wrong and he
Read more
Hans Fiene
HansFiene
Gorsuch's hypothetical example is one of the stupidest things a smart person has ever said. His example is this: Imagine you have two employees--a straight woman and a gay man.
Read more
Dominic Pino
DominicJPino
Little recent history:A 50-50 Senate is not a stable thing. Yes, Dems would have the advantage since Harris would break ties. But so did the GOP after the 2000 elections...
Read more
Meghan Roberts 🦦
MeghanKRoberts
I am neither a historian of early America nor the early Repub, but I am an expert on expertise, esp. women’s expertise. So I want to comment on what was
Read more
Lancaster Stands Up
lancstandsup
To kick off #BlackHistoryMonth , we are highlighting an incredible moment in Lancaster County history: The Christiana Resistance; when a community of free black men and women defended themselves against
Read more
Steven Mazie
stevenmazie
BREAKING: Supreme Court votes 5-4 to grant Catholic Diocese and orthodox Jews' request to block Gov. Cuomo's attendance limits at houses of worship in New York. Chief Justice Roberts joins
Read more
Nathan J Robinson
NathanJRobinson
Are the Supreme Court justices really such idiots that they can’t tell the difference between “things that involve large numbers of people in a room” and “things that involve small
Read more
Andy
AndyEyeballs
Unfortunately it's time to yell about RFRA again. Hold on to your butts, because here's the bad news about Monday's Title VII ruling. Gorsuch CAREFULLY leaves the door open for
Read more
Stephen Mouritsen
s_mouritsen
Stand back for an extremely minor observation about Bostock. Like super small potatoes. 1/x J. Gorsuch says: "What did 'discriminate' mean in 1964? As it turns out, it meant then
Read more
‹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
›
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our
Cookie Policy
to improve your experience.
I agree