#Decision

Health Nerd

GidMK

The entire field of epidemiology is about balancing cost and benefit, risk and reward. There is no choice without consequences, even the seemingly trivial ones Most Master of Public Health

D.Muthukrishnan

dmuthuk

Those who’ve been tracking my portfolio and investing method, please read the below thread carefully. I’ve been following focused investing, owning not less than 10 and more than 15 stocks.

Jenn K. MD

emergjenncy

I am now a proud recipient of the Pfizer #covid19 vaccine. I’m also pregnant. A 2/ I didn’t plan on publicly sharing this detail of my life, but I

The Leftist Lawyer 🌹

TheRealWebstir

A quick thread on the recent #FreeAssange decision from a small town plaintiff lawyer’s perspective:In family law, which i don’t specialize in, but practice enough to know, we call the

Cathal O'Donnell

cathal1972

Latest restrictions - some thoughtsWe have been well led through this crisis. We dodged a bullet in April/May/June - we didn't have army trucks transporting coffins (Italy), ICUs in tents

Andy Farke

AndyFarke

Some thoughts regarding the @geosociety decision to cut alcohol from oral/poster presentation sessions (a thread): I'm a beer drinker. I'm a homebrewer. I like...no, love...beer. That said, I'm completely OK

Ken Foxe

kenfoxe

You might remember in earlier days of the #Covid_19 pandemic, one of key forums for decision-making was the so-called "Senior Officials Group" ... they didn't want the public knowing what

lauren ahmed

laurenesab

COVID decisionmaking is too often what I call "decision hot potato" with my events teams. That is, no one wants to be responsible for saying "no, you can't," so everyone

Mark Wallace

wallaceme

My @theipaper column today is on the UK's decision not to join the centralised EU vaccine scheme. @MattHancock argued last July that "We think we will go faster this way."

Mark Granza

markgranza

The Trump ban did not reveal the power of big tech — far from it. It actually proved how little they hold. The unprecedented power of silencing the POTUS passed

Anne Applebaum

anneapplebaum

To be brutally clear: this legal change will force women to give birth to babies who will immediately die. That's it's main impact. Also, the court that took this decision

Matteo Lisi

mlisi6

New paper out! We developed a new method to study confidence in perceptual decision-making without requiring explicit rating scales, and found clear deviations from Bayesian accounts of subjective confidence.https://www.nature.com/articles/

Sirrafynah

SirrafynahPaul

LETTERS TO MY EXsAll the things I want to say to you but I can'tThread Most Recent downwardsAm sorry we can't work logically or spiritual and I had to leave

Lucas Roorda

LRoordaLaw

UK Supreme Court issuing decision on jurisdiction in Okpabi v. Shell right now. Core issues: necessary or proper party gateway, real issue to be tried. Court of Appeals decision (rejection

StealBasis

stealthebasis

I remember last year around this time when stocks had been non stop higher everyday since the "trade deal" being announced late aug. It felt like there would never be

Dale Johnson

DaleJohnsonESPN

Over a week since we last saw a VAR overturn, and there's very little to talk about in the Monday VAR thread. So short mention of: - Paul Pogba's penalty-

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.