I would always be cautious about the need to be formulaic with anti-racism or de-colonial work, in order for people to 'work with it'.
They are messy processes and needs to be understood as such, otherwise we risk maneuvering around structures & not addressing them.
1/5
They are messy processes and needs to be understood as such, otherwise we risk maneuvering around structures & not addressing them.
1/5
It's hard, but we CAN begin this work within the current systemic and structural constraints we have without seeking to be legitimized by those very structures we are trying to dismantle.
2/5
2/5
Also, although we know that incentives can be a motivating factor & 'bring people in', there is little evidence to indicate that certificates of acknowledgement or charter mark 'badges' translate into any meaningful structural or systemic change...
3/5
3/5
... rather it is a corporate tool used to enable organizations to 'perform' anti-racism, without living it.
When we only see change through a shift in data, we are using the Master's tools to repaint the house not dismantle it.
4/5
When we only see change through a shift in data, we are using the Master's tools to repaint the house not dismantle it.
4/5
Listen to the words of bell hooks:
"Knowledge was suddenly about information only. It had no relation to how one lived, behaved. It was no longer connected to antiracist struggle."
— bell hooks
5/5
"Knowledge was suddenly about information only. It had no relation to how one lived, behaved. It was no longer connected to antiracist struggle."
— bell hooks
5/5