I think it's irresponsible of @UNFCC to not only report the Arctic Amplification-weak jet stream theory as an accepted fact (which it isn't: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0662-y) but also to try and claim it can be immediately attributed to the cold-air outbreak over North America. https://twitter.com/UNFCCC/status/1361355803949756416
For example, we found that [in the Atlantic annual-mean] while the temperature gradient has been weakening in the lower troposphere (due to Arctic Amplification), the upper-level gradient has been strengthening, effectively offsetting each other https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1465-z
Further, Russell Blackport & @polar_james reported in 2020 that the link between waviness & temperature gradients "does not represent a forced response to Arctic amplification" https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/8/eaay2880
This is not to say Arctic Amplification cannot, has not, or will not impact jet stream behaviour. But in real-time, all we can and should say is this is an extreme example of internal variability (i.e., vortex disruption following a major SSW) & cold-air outbreaks are declining.
. @GeoffVallis, who literally wrote *the* book on atmospheric dynamics, says it well - https://twitter.com/GeoffVallis/status/1361444674653855748?s=20