The United States has an ambitious plan to get to population level immunity, but it doesn't have the vaccines to accomplish it (no less the buy in of Americans)
@WSJgraphic by @ErikBrynildsen @joshulick @TaylorUmlauf
@toddlindeman /1
Before the vaccine problems with Sanofi-GSK (wrong dose) and Astra Zeneca/Oxford (? dose) the US was already short in covering its population
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03370-6 /2
Eventually we'll have enough vaccines. But those with prior infections could be deferred. The problem is of the 60+ million people, confirmed infections were in 16 M. The rest were not tested or asymptomatic. What if we could accurately and rapidly determine serology status? /7
Modeling work by @bubar_kate @DanLarremore @CUBoulder @BioFrontiers and colleagues supports a much accelerated timeline if we prioritized vaccines for people who were seronegative (and other demographics)
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.08.20190629v2 /8
The problem with determining serostatus is the time from infection and false positives from current tests. If we had a rapid, accurate neutralizing antibody test or surrogate metric to support durable immune response, we could do this well /9
Another point that ironically helps us is that the proportion of the 60+ million infected (and >1 million/5 days now) is that 30-50% (w/ @youyanggu) will likely not opt to get the vaccine /10
Given vaccine supply issues, we need a smart strategy to accelerate our trajectory to herd immunity. An unmet need is a test that could provide guidance, which could also be used to verify a salutary immune response to the vaccines. /11
You can follow @EricTopol.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.