In the editorial, she misleads readers by playing fast and loose with numbers, and cherrypicking data.

Here, for example, she points to a large percentage increase on a small baseline rate in California—ignoring that ever so things are still far better than in South Dakota.
I've never published an OpEd with the @WSJ. When I published with the @NYTimes, however, the OpEd went through extensive fact-checking.

I can see how cherry-picking gets by. But how do outright lies—like the comparison between per capital cases in IL and SD—get through?
Printing blatant disinformation is dangerous on a completely different scale than printing the exceptionally poor takes that seem to be core to the @WSJopinion brand.

(TBF, the actual news reporting in the Journal can be very good.)

Time for some soul-searching, @WSJ.
You can follow @CT_Bergstrom.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.