It's rare that I see a company's mobile advertising metrics deteriorate where creative is *not* the culprit. Ironically: many companies think their marketing creative teams are over-resourced, but it's almost impossible for that to be the case. Some thoughts in a thread (1/X)
4/ Ad creative production can be harder because there are so few fundamental constraints on how an ad might look. Some ad creatives are obvious and fit to almost axiomatic templates, like this acorns ad https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=all&ad_type=all&country=US&view_all_page_id=432795363423568&sort_data[direction]=desc&sort_data[mode]=relevancy_monthly_grouped
7/ Event selection (across different segments and ultimately, at the level of the user) can be automated. For now, ad creative production mostly can't be. It's bewildering to me that companies will spend millions on data science automation platforms but not ad creative production
8/ Often companies see ad creative production as incidental and not a fundamental input to ad spend. But what else is going on in the background to drive ad spend? Campaign management is mostly automated and online ROAS / LTV models have been in place at big advertisers for years
9/ When a company's ad spend is declining (because metrics aren't holding), they often have no formal ad creative production process in place. 100% reliant on outsourcing firms. Creative testing is haphazard. No logic behind creative testing success standards.
You can follow @eric_seufert.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.