Back pain generates significant financial costs for society in developed countries, such as the United States of America, Japan, Europe and Australia (e.g. US$80 billion per year in direct and indirect costs in the United States of America): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18164449/ 

3/24
Chronic low back pain (i.e. ≄12 weeks duration) presents the greatest challenge:

It generates the greatest proportion of economic burden due to back pain: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11987929/ 

It affects 20% of the global population: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22231424/ 

4/24
There are a number of different modes of exercise training, however prior pairwise meta-analysis concluded that there was no evidence that any particular mode of exercise was more effective than another for non-specific chronic low back pain: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20227641/ 

7/24
In our recent network meta-analysis, published in the @BJSM_BMJ, we sought to identify the effectiveness of specific exercise training modalities in adults with NSCLBP: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-100886

9/24
These modalities were also compared to ‘true control’ (i.e. no intervention) and non-exercise treatments, such as treatment where the therapist provided ‘hands-on’ treatment (e.g. massage, manual therapy) or ‘hands-off’ treatment (e.g. education, GP management).

10/24
Collectively, 89 studies and a total of 5578 patients were included.

11/24
For improving pain, there was low-quality evidence that Pilates, aerobic and stabilisation/motor control exercise training were optimal.

13/24
For improving physical function (reducing disability) there was low quality evidence that stabilisation/motor control and resistance exercise training were the most effective.

14/24
For improving mental health, there was low-quality evidence that resistance and aerobic were best.

15/24
Only seven studies (8%) had low risk of bias.

16/24
Few studies examined trunk muscle strength, trunk muscle endurance and analgesic pharmacotherapy use, making it difficult to compare the effect of different exercise modalities on these outcomes.

17/24
Future studies examining these outcomes are warranted given the importance of considering these variables during the management of non-specific chronic low back pain: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31610090/ 

18/24
Stretching and McKenzie exercises did not differ to true control for pain or function.🧐

19/24
In our analysis stabilisation/motor control and Pilates had a clinically significant (>20 point pain reduction on a scale 0-100) greater effect on reducing pain than these exercises modes.

20/24
It is important to consider that exercise does not happen in isolation. Through exercise with an individualised approach, a person with non-specific chronic low back pain can improve confidence in movement and address functional deficits concurrently.

21/24
As we contend in our publication, understanding of the biopsychosocial aspects of (chronic) pain is important for all clinicians managing people with non-specific chronic low back pain.

22/24
CONCLUSION: We expect that there is no one particular kind of exercise that is 'the best' for non-specific chronic low back pain. Rather, we interpret our findings to mean that a range of active exercise therapies are most effective for non-specific chronic low back pain.

23/24
CONCLUSION: Our interpretation is that active exercise, where a patient is progressed through a program guided by an appropriately trained clinician to improve their function, is likely the best form of exercise training for non-specific chronic low back pain.

24/24
You can follow @PatrickOwenPhD.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.