Coverage of disease modelling tends to focuses on population-level 'what could happen next?' scenario analyses and predictions. So I wanted to highlight some early COVID-19 insights that you've probably heard about, but may not realise modelling groups were involved in... 1/
An early (and widely reported) suggestion that the COVID outbreak was much bigger than the 41 initial cases reported in China in early Jan came from analysis by @MRC_Outbreak of cases exported to other countries. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51148303 2/
Early identification of substantial transmission in Washington State came from phylogenetic modelling by @trvrb et al https://bedford.io/blog/ncov-cryptic-transmission/ 8/
It's important to have rigorous critiques and reviews of modelling studies, but equally critics should be careful about making sweeping statements about disease models, when the modelling contribution to the evidence base has been wider and more nuanced than many realise. 10/10
You can follow @AdamJKucharski.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.