/1 In this thread I'm going to offer my professional data analytics opinion on the tweet that is embedded here 👇

NOTE: I have a Ph.D. in statistics. https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/status/1240274548165169157
/2 First off, this study suffers from a lack of randomization and therefore the external validity can be called into question. Secondly, it does not appear that statistical methods appropriate for non-randomized studies were...
/3...employed. For example, propensity score matching or "binning" could have been used to help ensure baseline characteristics between the treated and non-treated subjects were more homogeneous followed with a method appropriate for matched subjects...
/4 ...or a generalized linear model taking key baseline characteristics into account could have been used. Proper identification of those characteristics would need to be supported with a literature search related to chloroquine with typical candidates being things like...
/5...age, sex, or race. Furthermore, the analysis relies on a categorical endpoint of 50% reduction of viral load at Day 7. This has the advantage of avoiding a lot of distributional assumption checking but throws away a lot of information, especially in a small study.
/6 Far better would be to use actual viral loads at Day 7 as a continuous endpoint and accept the burden of doing distributional assumption checking. This would preserve valuable information in a small study.
/7 Setting aside the lack of sophistication of the statistical methodology and categorical endpoint, the adverse event and dropout profiles of the treated and non-treated subjects needs to be considered. Of 26 patients treated with chloroquine, 6 dropped out = 23%.
/8 A 23% dropout rate is ridiculously bad. Three of these subjects dropped out because they had to be transferred to the ICU = 11.5%, 1 subject died, 1 left the hospital, and 1 developed nausea so severe they had to stop treatment.
/9 Of note, NONE of the "control" (and I use that term loosely here) subjects dropped out or were lost to follow up. This proves the fact that chloroquine is a nasty drug with horrible side effects, EVEN WHEN ADMINISTERED IN A HOSPITAL SETTING.
/10 Going back to the statistical analysis, true Intent-to-Treat analysis would take the dropouts into account. The authors of this paper make it clear on page 20, Table 2, that they performed their analysis on the N=20 chloroquine subjects that didn't drop out. This is biased.
/11 I don't have the time right now to re-do the Fisher's Exact Test the authors appear to have performed, but the Intent-to-Treat analysis would add back the N=6 chloroquine subjects as treatment failures and the p-value would get a lot bigger.

#fin
/12 Have to follow-up with this. The world has literally gone mad in its quest to find *anything* hopeful. To be clear, #chloroquine *might* be helpful, we just don't know yet. Too early imo to be setting major policies around a bunch of speculation. https://twitter.com/kerpen/status/1240315649169244161?s=20
/13 Okay, I have used the 'ExactCIDiff' package in R, version 3.6.3 for Windows, 64 bit, to compute the ITT difference of proportions along with a 95% confidence interval:

Estimate = 41.3%
95% confidence interval = (10.8%,64.3%)
/14 This means, **based on this study**, an additional 10.8% to 64.3% of h-chloroquine treated subjects experienced at least 50% reductions in viral titers at Day 7 as compared to the "control" subjects.
/15 For a reference to the statistical methodology underpinning the 'ExactCIdiff' package for R, please see https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2013/RJ-2013-026/RJ-2013-026.pdf.
/16 minor errata: in /14 I should have added the clause "we are 95% confident that..." preceding the statement "an additional 10.8%...".

And, reiterate, these kinds of efficacy claims depend on the validity of the study, which is far from clear.
/17 And I'll add this article by @business to this thread. Media now acknowledging #hydroxychloroquine and #chloroquine can be deadly if mishandled. Not the kind of drug you trot off to CVS to buy, it must be dosed in a hospital and closely monitored. https://twitter.com/business/status/1240994273555873793?s=20
/18 Now $NVS is getting into the hydroxychloroquine game... Hey, here's a thought: why not donate free Rx to the very-much-needed clinical trials that will give us a better sense of whether this works great (with or without nasty side effects)? https://twitter.com/AndrewE_Dunn/status/1241032671222009856?s=20
/19 Update. Here's a truly promising clinical trial with larger sample sizes. I offer a few comments following this post.

RT @Clarksterh thx for pointing out
RT @AndyBiotech
HT @boriquagato @rocket_jenross @MotherCabriniNY @WallStCynic https://twitter.com/AndyBiotech/status/1240666041245732864?s=20
/20 Several of my criticisms of the French study also apply to this Chinese study of Kaletra vs. Favipiravir:

-lack of randomization
-in the absence of randomization, a method such as propensity score matching should be used to ensure comparability between study arms
...
/21
...and then followed with a statistical methodology suited to paired subjects (simple example would be paired t-test if comparing means). This would be "silver" or "bronze" standard
- if not matching using propensities, a regression model including key baseline factors...
/22
...should be employed to at least help balance things out -- AND THEY DID THIS. See Tables 3 and 4 in the paper. This might be called a "bronze-ish" standard. Not as good as running a randomized trial or matching with propensities, but far better than nothing at all.
/23 Also of note is the vastly improved adverse event profile of Favipiravir vs. Kaletra -- see Table 5. I have previously stated that if an elderly relative was infected with ncov19 I'd ask for Kaletra; now I'd ask for Favipiravir. Very encouraging study.
/24 Last comment for today. Go back and compare the dropout rate (23%) in the #hydroxychloroquine group in the French study (I discuss in /8 of this thread).

Now ask yourself, would you want Favipiravir or #chloroquine?
/26 Here are two MUST FOLLOWS with respect to #coronavirus:

@angie_rasmussen -- noted virologist
@KrutikaKuppalli -- emerging diseases physician

And see this post and embedded link. HT @MotherCabriniNY @rocket_jenross @boriquagato https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1241458560694767616?s=20
/27 And a fun podcast full of great information about #coronavirus: https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1242109178325241856?s=20
/28 Another possible Rx to use in the fight against #nCov19 #coronavirus might be #losartan (an anti-hypertensive in the "ARB" class of drugs).

RT @cjtign
HT @boriquagato @MotherCabriniNY @rocket_jenross -- just a follow up on previous tweets

https://twitter.com/cjtign/status/1245974607649218560?s=20
/30 Here's a good update regarding HCO and it's helpfulness with #nCov19 infections -- looks like it might really be a game-changer. Note: I'm still interested in seeing more safety data. HT @boriquagato @rocket_jenross @MotherCabriniNY https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1247169518046081024?s=20
/31 FDA now receiving ANDA's for HCO / CO

RT @FirstSquawk HT @boriquagato @rocket_jenross @MotherCabriniNY https://twitter.com/FirstSquawk/status/1249818641089978368?s=20
/32 And some good news regarding #remdesivir RT @JCOviedo6 https://twitter.com/JCOviedo6/status/1250884588030668800?s=20
/35 Interesting #nCov19 #coronavirus news. Some asymptomatic persons from Diamond Princess have had troubling chest CT scan results. RT @AndyBiotech

https://twitter.com/AndyBiotech/status/1253507050476384257?s=20
/36 A recently published #NBER working paper explores NY subway passenger density and #nCov19 incidence. Here's the link, with a screenshot.

HT @MotherCabriniNY @rocket_jenross

https://www.nber.org/papers/w27021 
/37a Commentary: proponents of the "Swedish" solution (ie, open everything up) are, in my opinion, ignoring population density and mass transit in their thinking. Sweden is like Alaska or Montana - very sparsely populated, not at all like New York.
/37b cont... If the USA "opens up" I think it should be nuanced. Try it in sparsely populated areas first, and restrict to persons under some well-chosen age limit. Something like <40. Continue from there.
/40 Welp.

#nCov19 #coronavirus #hydroxychroloquine

rt @followtheh https://twitter.com/followtheh/status/1272555278152630273?s=20
/41 Now for some GREAT news 👇 in the fight against #nCoV19. Dex, which is also used to treat HAPE and HACE, helps with the cytokine storm that afflicts most hospitalized people.

ht @EpsilonTheory @rocket_jenross @MotherCabriniNY @traderjrae

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53061281
/44 Went to Costco for a battery today. Lady in line in front of me is a San Diego nurse. Found out El Centro has run out of beds for #nCov19 cases, sending them elsewhere in Calif. And Arizona is 83% of capacity as a state.

#SecondWave
/45 #nCov19 #covid #tocilizumab #remdesivir #lenzilumab
This looks especially promising 👇
rt @AlphaTrader00
ht @MotherCabriniNY @rocket_jenross https://twitter.com/AlphaTrader00/status/1283474018226462721?s=20
/46 #nCov19 #covid

Time for an offbeat update. Ever heard of #Pharos capital group? They have a nice website and experienced team, from the looks of it:

https://www.pharosfunds.com/contact-us.php 
/47 #nCov19 #covid

But if you look around at their website, you can't find anything about their CEO. According to crunchbase, the CEO is Michael Coudrey and Pharos has its fingers in a *lot* of pies:
/48 #nCov19 #covid

The most interesting aspect, to me, about Michael Coudrey (and #Pharos?) is their active participation in "social media and ‘digital information warfare’ services to political candidates". See this:

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/it-s-nightmare-how-brazilian-scientists-became-ensnared-chloroquine-politics
/49 #nCov19 #covid

Mr. Coudrey has, apparently, helped President Trump author some of his tweets about hydroxychloroquine:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-21/trump-pushes-malaria-drug-for-covid-19-but-evidence-is-lacking
/51 #nCov19 #covid

In reference to /48, Mr. Coudrey isn't the only person with a negative view of the Brazilian study that examined #hydroxychloroquine:
/52 #nCov19 #covid

Time to add some more. Dr. Todaro @JamesTodaroMD is thoughtful and articulate and I appreciate his tweets (not snark, being serious). Here is an important one & please read his entire thread: https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/status/1289563472456552449?s=20
/53 #nCov19 #covid

I do disagree with /8 and /9 of Dr. Todaro's thread. Here is a summary of the results of the trial Dr. Todaro cites.
/54 #nCov19 #covid

The p-values and confidence intervals from this study are *not* motivating. Excluding the N=2 non-covid hospitalizations in the Pbo group yields N=8 hospitalized Pbo versus N=4 hospitalized HCL subjects, in a study with N=423 1:1 randomized subjects.
/55 #nCov19 #covid

This means 3.8% placebo hospitalized versus 1.9% HCL hospitalized, while the HCL subjects had 2x the medication side-effects (read: adverse events).

That means taking a lot of risk to achieve a 1.9% reduction in hospitalization rates.
/56 #nCov19 #covid

I **DO* agree with Dr. Todaro @JamesTodaroMD that more studies of HCL in "mild" subjects need to be conducted -- a better-controlled RCT with better inclusion/exclusion criteria is needed. But the medical community also needs to define "mild" more rigorously
/57 #nCov19 #covid

Last one in this subthread. I have no problem with the fact the study endpoints were changed. This happened in blinded fashion so no bias was introduced and the reasons are very clear.

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-4207
/59 #nCov19 #covid

Great article 👇 ... good science takes time and is very complex. Can't be boiled down to a sound bite or rushed.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-08-25/false-promise-warp-speed-science
/60 #nCov19 #covid #Sweden

To everyone who thought Sweden's "herd immunity" model for #covid was awesome... guess what? They are starting to lock down. Would someone please let [at] boriqua gato know?

ht @MotherCabriniNY

This 👇
/61 #nCov19 #covid #Sweden

--SWEDEN IS STARTING TO LOCK DOWN--
--SWEDEN IS STARTING TO LOCK DOWN--
--SWEDEN IS STARTING TO LOCK DOWN--

Here's journalistic proof of the correspondence I reference in /60

http://www.china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2020-10/28/content_76850000.htm
/62 #nCov19 #covid #France

Glimpse of the future
RT @MsResJudicata https://twitter.com/MsResJudicata/status/1321211541539196928
/64 #nCov19 #covid #ElPaso

ht @DiMartinoBooth https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1321956364101521410
/65 #nCov19 #covid #UnitedStates

It's likely #Chanukah / #Christmas / #NewYearsEve will be very cheerless this year... I'm expecting a major lockdown. https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1322313748267307008?s=20
/66 #nCov19 #covid

Bye, #HerdImmunity.
#SwedenGotItWrong https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1322972966464954371?s=20
/67 #nCov19 #covid $pfe

Here is an excellent thread on the biostatistical aspects of the #Pfizer vaccine interim analysis announcement.

rt @nataliexdean https://twitter.com/nataliexdean/status/1325820512946302977?s=20
You can follow @dapstats.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.