#Leaseholders

Miles Dilworth

MilesDilworth

1) Jenrick to announce plans to help victims of building safety scandal tomorrow. Understand plan will mean no leaseholders in buildings above 18m will have to pay for the removal

Peter Apps

PeteApps

Short thoughts on the Labour amendment on Monday: One of the key impacts of this is an attempt to make the govt face up to the fact that its rhetoric

Shared Ownership Resources

ResourcesShared

A thread on proposed Gov reforms aiming to make it easier and cheaper for leaseholders to buy their homes...1/ 7https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-reforms-make-it-easier-and-cheaper-for-leaseholders-to-buy-their-homes Removin

Cladding Jack

CladdingJack

Time for some facts about building safety in the UK, as there's a lot of misconceptions in the media:1. Just 5% of dangerous cladding is ACM2. Cladding is only one

Peter Apps

PeteApps

NEW: Ahead of Jenrick's announcement later today, Inside Housing has polled 1,300 affected leaseholders about the impact of the cladding crisis. The picture is bleak:- One in six actively exploring

Rose Grayston

rosegrayston

Who benefits from Permitted Development Rights? Not homeless households who will have to live in the crap homes they create for wont of any decent alternative, and not leaseholders, but

Sarah Jones MP

LabourSJ

1/7 The Government’s handling of the cladding crisis has lacked any sense of grip or urgency. We have deep concerns that people are being put at risk, trapped in flammable

Tom White

TBIZZLEBEAR

Fantastic article, and campaign, from a paper I rarely agree with. Cautiously optimistic:- Optimistic because this is a comprehensive, persuasive piece, in the UK's second most read newspaper (which has

Suzanne Richards

CllrSuzanne

A thread because I couldn't condense thoughts into just 1 tweet. Its clear from today that Govt still haven't got a grip or understanding of the post Grenfell remediation problem.

Jack Simpson

JSimpsonjourno

Before the cladding debate starts today, I think context is important.For nearly three and a half years the government has been consistently saying that leaseholders should not pay for cladding

Nearly Legal

nearlylegal

Now I am thoroughly, very much for finding an alternative to dumping the costs of build defects and cladding remediation on leaseholders of existing buildings, but I find this slightly

City Point 2 M3

city_m3

1/7 The Building Safety fund have started rejecting claims for cavity barriers when not behind flammable cladding. Many will not receive funding for cavity barriers.#EndOurCladdingScandal 2/7 Costs for other safety

Jack Simpson

JSimpsonjourno

My story today on the extortionate bill leaseholders living in @MpmtSalford are facing. It is the perfect example of why the cladding scandal is not just about cladding. My threadhttps://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/leaseholders-facing-1000

Leaseholders Deserve Better

LeaseholdersB

1. To all #Conservatives MPs: Thousands of us have written to you about the horrors Leaseholders face on a daily basis because of the #CladdingScandal caused by grave failures in

S_Timea

STimea3

THREAD:@ChrisPincher your performance in the House just now was deplorable. The government's own figures show that only 65 BSF applications had been progressed to formal application stage. Yet you tried

Jess Kendall

JessKendall93

1/5 Fed up of @Conservatives MPs generic replies to #EndOurCladdingScandal-"£1bn BSF" is ~£13bn short-freeholders won't "do the right thing" & pay to remediate their unsafe building unless @GOVUK MAKE them-&quo

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.