#Supremecourt

Steven Mazie

stevenmazie

A case study in Chief Justice John Roberts's strategy for navigating politically fraught cases in the Trump era is about to come to a close not with a bang but—as

Sister Helen Prejean

helenprejean

Justice Sotomayor opens her dissent in U.S. v. Dustin Higgs by saying the names of every person executed by the federal government over the past year. Sotomayor continues by providing

stephen fowler

stphnfwlr

Good morning! Several Georgia state lawmakers saw the Texas AG suit seeking to overturn results in 4 battleground states, heard our AG call it "constitutionally, legally and factually wrong" and

Teri Kanefield

Teri_Kanefield

Ladies and gentlemen, in the center circus ring, we have [ drum roll ] Trump’s next Hail Mary attempt to steal the election . . . . . . faithless

Gabriel Malor

gabrielmalor

Last night SCOTUS held that California may not put a flat ban on indoor worship, but may impose a 25% capacity limitation, masking, distancing rules, and a singing ban. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a136_bq7c.pdfJustice

Alpha OmegaEnergy "The Energy Kraken"

AOECOIN

#Breaking #BreakingNews #SupremeCourt COMPROMISED! Staffer went #WhistleBlower & said he heard Justice #Roberts, suspected of being Dirty & a Mole, seen w' Clinton on Epstein Island, SCREAMING Insisting that the

Diala Shamas

dialash

Today, the Supreme Court sided with our Muslim clients, finding that they can pursue their demands for damages from FBI agents who harassed them and tried to coerce them to

STEMtheBleeding

STEMthebleeding

Watching Trump supporters scream about all of the money they lost on betting sites today when the electoral college voted might by my new favorite thing about 2020.These idiots went

Corentin Sellin

CorentinSellin

JEU, SET ET MATCH #Biden.* Dixit la #CourSuprême. * Oh ben zut alors, comment réagiront Louparctiquedu92 et ZinzinuleMasquée de Twitter qui s'étaient mis au droit constitutionnel US depuis 15 jours

Eric Rassbach

ericrassbach

The Supreme Court may soon decide whether California’s COVID-related ban on indoor worship—the only one in the nation—can be squared with the Free Exercise Clause. Here’s a thread on what

the squad (6'3)

RafasItchyButt

Allow me to offer some commentary on several SCOTUS cases that are NOT the #moab, but which, considered in aggregate, will reveal my impressions on the #TRUMPSMASH #lawOfFunny Can someone

Jeremias Adams-Prassl

JeremiasPrassl

BREAKING: #Uber drivers *ARE* workers, rules UK #SupremeCourt, rejecting @Uber 's final appeal. Potentially huge implications for #ukemplaw, and the #gigeconomy business model - full thread with first analysis coming

Sahil Kapur

sahilkapur

NEW tonight: Trump administration files a brief asking the Supreme Court to wipe out Obamacare, arguing that the individual mandate is unconstitutional and that the entirety of the law must

Jack

Jackscarab

Thread on the #SupremeCourt #Oklahoma #CreekNation McGirt v. Oklahoma ruling today, because prior posts were made on my phone at work and therefore lacking.This also provides a bit of Oklahoma

GovTrack.🇺🇸

govtrack

Should we do a thread about the allegations of 2020 election fraud actually at issue in the mind boggling Texas case?https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336811823232921600 Just finished reading the section on Pennsylvania and it

Eric Rassbach

ericrassbach

BREAKING: #SCOTUS rules California must immediately allow houses of worship to reopen at 25% of occupancy, ending California's ban on indoor worship, which had been the only one in the

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.