#Court

kill 💀 tim 💀 faust

crulge

The biggest obstacle to Medicare for All isn't the insurers, believe it or not—it's the providers (hospital corps, pharma, and the AMA). But the AMA is not representative of doctors

Nick Wallis

nickwallis

Depp v NGN update: as you know, the High Court judge who found against Johnny Depp after the recent Depp v NGN libel trial refused him an opportunity to appeal

Joe Nierman (Parler: @JoeNierman)

NiermanJoe

I want to share an important point about every amici curiae brief that has been filed in TX v. PA.No amicus brief is accepted without Court permission. Together with the

Conor Gallagher

ConorGallaghe_r

I mentioned the bravery of the judge earlier but it's also worth noting the incredible bravery shown by the Garda negotiator. He entered the courtroom alone when, as far as

Sam Feldman 🌹

srfeld

Something I (& my clients) find very frustrating about the appeals process is that it takes forever. Some who'll become my client may be jailed the moment he's convicted or

Neal Katyal

neal_katyal

Make no mistake about it: the Trump Administration just asked the Supreme Court to gut all of the Affordable Care Act, and its insurance&protections for those with preexisting conditions. They

MaryBeth Musumeci

mmusumec

After today's #SCOTUS oral argument in the case challenging the #ACA, I’m cautiously optimistic the law will survive. Even if the Court finds the mandate unconstitutional, Chief Justice Roberts &

Lily S. Axelrod

LilySAxelrod

(Thread) Deportation defense in the age of Trump / COVID-19 / post office shenanigans / patriarchy: client is pregnant, due just 3 weeks after her asylum trial, so I filed

Joanna Schwartz

JCSchwartzProf

Today’s summary reversal in Taylor v. Riojas is a big deal. In it, SCOTUS breathed new life into the notion that qualified immunity should be denied if the constitutional violation

Dan Crenshaw

DanCrenshawTX

The left-wing outrage is predictably over the top. The request here is simple: allow this case to be elevated to the Supreme Court, and let the Supreme Court make a

Sunny McSunnyface

sunnyright

Don’t let them sell you on the notion that packing the court is the equivalent or logical response to filling an existent vacant seat in compliance with federal law. We

Brad Heath

bradheath

Pennsylvania has filed its response to Texas' Supreme Court lawsuit. Texas, it says "added its voice to the cacophony of bogus claims. Texas seeks to invalidate elections in four states

Jaime Santos

Jaime_ASantos

This is an unprecedented decision. It’s not a vacation a stay. It’s a grant of cert before judgment and a merits decision designating a new state of execution. Without any

Q. Anthony (FKA Andray Domise)

andraydomise

Sensational. I'm probably late to this, but Twitter nuked the SciHub account You couldn't ask for a better example of knowledge democratization than SciHub and Libgen, but of course we'll

Andrew Neil

afneil

The Spectator on why the Scottish parliament must publish all relevant evidence -- or end up "null and void": "Last week, The Spectator went to the High Court in Edinburgh

Marin K Levy

marinklevy

So...once again, it seems like some lawyers could have benefited from a little judicial administration history lesson – this time about the U.S Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.