Toggle navigation
TWunroll
TWunroll
faq
Contact US
#Bostock
Doron Dorfman
DorfmanDoron
Why is the #Bostock SCOTUS decision is important from a #DisabilityRights point of view? A ThreadCC: @clarkeja @katie_eyer @ezraiyoung @BRSoucek @lsepper @AnthonyMKreis @ProfLWiley @profmohapatra @Jeharrislaw @Maayan_Sudai @kmtani 1 / 12
Read more
Ian Millhiser
imillhiser
1 )I'm seeing a few conservatives, including people with JDs who should know better, argue that Bostock -- the Supreme Court's recent LGBTQ rights decision -- is an attack on
Read more
Andrew T. Walker
andrewtwalk
A thread on the significant unknown variable facing religious liberty: After Bostock, how will "sex" be understood for the possibility of religious exemptions throughout its application in federal law? Title
Read more
Andy
AndyEyeballs
Unfortunately it's time to yell about RFRA again. Hold on to your butts, because here's the bad news about Monday's Title VII ruling. Gorsuch CAREFULLY leaves the door open for
Read more
Kasey Suffredini
KaseySuffredini
A lot of people have asked me what yesterday’s #SCOTUS ruling means for other federal laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex. Here’s my take. #LGBTQ discrimination in
Read more
Mike Sacks
MikeSacksEsq
Because I reject Gorsuch's dependence of a rigid Scalian textualism, and believe Scalia himself would have written a dissent even more wild than Alito's, I think the best and most
Read more
Katie Eyer
katie_eyer
1/24 A thread on yesterday’s decision in Bostock. The takeaways: (1) The majority's textualist reasoning was correct and a major win for LGBTQ employees; (2) While important issues for trans
Read more
Frank Bowman
FOBowman3
1/10 Those looking past Trump shld watch floor speech by Sen Josh Hawley @HawleyMO on Bostock opinion.https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4887276/user-clip-sen-hawley-speech-june-16-2020. For law nerds, headline is that Josh declares conservativ
Read more
Black Together Again
KProtein19
THREAD: Not even 24 hours into his presidency, Biden issued an executive order (EO) directing all federal agencies to essentially dismantle the sex-based rights/protections of women/girls. Even many protections for
Read more
Nathan Triplett 🏛️ 🚌 🏕
NathanTriplett
The Court left for another day questions re housing, education, and public accommodation discrimination under *federal* law. But, the Michigan Civil Rights Commission has answered those questions under the Elliott-Larsen
Read more
Kevin Tobia
kevin_tobia
My paper is now out in @HarvLRev! Originalist & textualist theories seek the “original public meaning” of legal texts. This paper takes those theories on their own terms, testing whether
Read more
Jim Antle
jimantle
I share many of these criticisms of Trump personally without finding the criticisms of conservative Trump voters persuasive.https://twitter.com/John_Scotus/status/1303511778236669952 Who are the conservative/Republican presidents who balanc
Read more
Sharon_McGowan
SharonMcGowanDC
The Equality Act does much more than clarify that the Supreme Court's approach to sex discrimination in Bostock was correct, but that alone is an impt reason to pass the
Read more
David French
DavidAFrench
Post-Bostock, some folks are saying religious liberty is in terminal decline. For almost 30 years, however, the trend has been in the opposite direction -- strengthening the citadel of religious
Read more
DANIEL MOODY
DNLMDY
MEGATHREAD:BOSTOCK, SEX, GENDER, AND LEGAL ANTHROPOLOGY: QUESTIONS FOR THE PERPLEXED My illegible notes on Bostock v. Clayton County, sex, gender, and legal anthropology are currently in the process of morphing
Read more
SK Rossi
S_K_Rossi
Good morning #mtleg! Boy do I have a #thread for you. Last night Biden signed the following Executive order: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-preventing-and-combating-discrimination-on
Read more
‹
1
2
›
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our
Cookie Policy
to improve your experience.
I agree