. @cmclymer, a leftist political operative, recently underwent an identity change, now going by the name of Charlotte (previously Charles). Some wonder if the transition's a strategic shield against the #MeToo movement, considering Clymer's sordid HISTORY with women. Take a look:

Under the identity "Charles Clymer," Charlotte reportedly had many altercations with women. Clymer's reputation for misogyny even sparked the hashtag #STOPClymer. "Charles" has also been accused of stealing content, fabricating details about it, and once mocked the #BLM movement.

As "Charles," outlets called @cmclymer a "bad guy," asked if he were a "villain," and flat-out called him "creepy." @BitchMedia even formally removed an article "Charles" had written on their site. Could a reportedly predatory past be why "Charles" suddenly became "Charlotte"?

When a man transitions to a woman, should it excuse their past as a tormenter of women?

Absolutely not.

#STOPClymer links:

"villian"?: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/darlena-cunha/men-feminism_b_3275303.html

"bad guy": https://www.thecut.com/2014/10/you-want-to-be-a-male-feminist-maybe-dont.html

"creepy": https://www.salon.com/2014/12/02/fast_company_promotes_live_chat_with_creepy_male_feminist/

"problematic actions": https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/should-women-be-drafted-not-sexual-assault-women-military-assaulted

If Charlotte Clymer’s recent transition to female is a direct result of the negative reputation attached to the name “Charles Clymer,” LGBT should be outraged. That’s blatant mocking of transgenderism. Clymer identified as male, then genderqueer, & now female.

What’s the truth?

Bruce Jenner kills someone in a car wreck: suddenly transitions to Caitlyn.

Bradley Manning is imprisoned for whistleblowing: suddenly transitions to Chelsea.

Charles Clymer seeks to hide from a history of tormenting women: suddenly transitions to Charlotte.

A coincidence?