Here is the detailed tweetorial on this debate. Predominantly the first part in favor of stress #whyCMR.
Follow along.
did you know that the FFR was validated with ETT/SPECT/DSE in 45 patients only?
we use 0.8 instead of 0.75?
#SCMR2021 https://twitter.com/purviparwani/status/1362510397715083265
Follow along.


#SCMR2021 https://twitter.com/purviparwani/status/1362510397715083265
#SCMR2021
data showing CMR is as good if not better than SPECT.
#whyCMR also better with risk stratification with available prognostic data
FFR - binary
Stress CMR perfusion imaging with gradient of imaging severity


FFR - binary
Stress CMR perfusion imaging with gradient of imaging severity
MR-INFORM #whyCMR
CMR is excellent gatekeeper for cardiac Cath
it led to decrease in Cath/ PCI without any difference in clinical outcomes compared to FFR
#SCMR2021


#SCMR2021
Stress CMR can offer
rapid CMT sequence establish efficient workflow
no radiation
noninvasive nature( less risky compared to the FFR)
diagnostic accuracy and prognostic implication
#SCMR2021




#SCMR2021
When asked about #Ischemia & role of CCT
#SCMR2021
Dr. Greenwood said
1.Ischemia nt designed to test imaging modalities
2.Promise data~10K population with quite heterogeneity in study arm( should hv worked in favor of CT)didn’t show any diff. in outcomes
3. MVD can be missed.
#SCMR2021
Dr. Greenwood said
1.Ischemia nt designed to test imaging modalities
2.Promise data~10K population with quite heterogeneity in study arm( should hv worked in favor of CT)didn’t show any diff. in outcomes
3. MVD can be missed.
@ColinBerryMD on use of #FFR
#CardioTwitter
#SCMR2021
FFR indicates lesion level ischemia
FFR indices such as PPG predict PCI success
adjunct guide wire techniques such as IMR/CFR permit stratified medicine use in INOCA
@DBelardoMD @DrMarthaGulati
#CardioTwitter
#SCMR2021



@DBelardoMD @DrMarthaGulati