Pulled an all nighter to read this book last night.
Thread incoming.
Yes it really was called The Apartheid of Sex.
Many of the arguments will be familiar. Book is from 1990’s.

Author is a late transitioning male, with a wife (who he calls his “Spice” because he makes up language). He also fathered children.
You will likely have heard this name before :Martine Rothblatt. If unfamiliar head over to @11thBlog & @bjportraits

Martine thinks single sex spaces etc are akin to apartheid . Hence the rather subtle title. Is this why the #Woke call us (Femi) #Nazis and the odd accusations of anti-semitism for saying “biology is real” or other inflammatory stuff. Or other #Facts.

The gigantic leaps of logic in this book make Dick Fosbury (Fosbury Flop) look lacking in ambition. L.A had drag queens ergo sexual dimorphism is crumbling before our very eyes.

Rothblatt argues that sex is no longer a meaningful category. @bbceducation showed a lack of ambition when they went for a 100 genders Rothblatt was aiming for 5 billion. Women demanding sex segregated spaces are the type of people who would have imprisoned Nelson Mandela.

LMFAO. Rothblatt is calling this a “grassroots” movement. Billionaire says what? (Look up astro-turfing. Especially if you are lefty bloke with socialist in your bio).

Get ready for some (lots) of sex is a spectrum, “intersex bingo” stuff. #EverySingleTime.

Sex is determined by a “cursory examination” of a baby’s genitals. & “Manhood” or “Womanhood” is a life style choice. Open to anyone “regardless of genitalia”. Good to know Martine.

There’s that phraseology “people with vaginas”. He does this a lot. Nobody is saying “genitalia” determines competence. We do say women and girls should not have to undress with strange penis-havers. The male sex should not compete in women’s sport or take women’s places in orgs

He go’s into more detail about sports later but here he highlights that Renee Richards was allowed to play in female tennis. In fact Renee was a trainer for Martina Navratilova which rather begs the question re Martina being called “transphobic” . More on Renee in a minute.

Here Renee repudiates their earlier decision to play against females, conceding it was unfair.

There’s a lot of sleight of hand in these arguments. Ideas are floated re #LadyBrain only to be seemingly repudiated but in fact subtly reinforced. The chromosomes argument is a tactic to claim a sort of biologically determinist argument for transsexuality. Rebuttals incoming.

This U.K. article, in the British Medical Journal, explains routine karyotype testing was abandoned because there isn’t a higher proportion with chromosomal abnormalities in the trans community. Claiming an “intersex” identity is a political tactic/psychological compulsion.

Pardon me. This #LadyBrain needs to attend to my bladder, go to the supermarket, cook tea...etc. I will then resume what will be a very long thread later this evening. . It really does need a very long thread. Fascinating. Clinically Fascinating.

This is the #BigPharma argument.
Now we are pushing hormones on our youth to normalise transgenderism we can no longer recognise biological sex?
Where’s Ben Goldacre when you need him?
That’s right. Resolutely staying silent on the biggest scandal of the last three decades.

Ooh. #FaustoSterling. This has *not* aged well. #SexIsASpectrum ? She argued there are five “sexes” and 4% of births are to some extent “intersex”. Or was she being ironic?
That’s one way to spin it.

Two quotes from Fausto-Sterling. If genitals are now “cultural” are the male lesbian’s genitals “culturally imperialist”?
Asking for a fraysexual/uni sexual/pansexual/JolyonGenderal friend.
Don’t judge. I have not slept and it’s very complicated.

More on Fausto-Sterling.
Stand down everyone. It was all tongue in cheek. Let’s not worry about our kids (many gay or autistic) who are at this moment pumping themselves full of cross sex hormones & having double mastectomies. Anne was only having a lend of us.
Hilarious.

Interesting. If you read the whole thing there’s many rebuttals re female and male brains connected to bio sex but somehow the idea of an “intersex” brain still remains. Sex denialism for actual biological women but “intersex” brains for autogynephilic males.
Do you see it yet?

Just including this because it will resonate cos we see this all the time. Not what Simone meant.
Also a good opportunity to credit it the superb @PankhurstEM
update. “Women are born, not worn”.
We must ensure that she gets the credit for her work.

Check back to the previous quote. I have no big argument with this statement as a stand alone but it sits oddly with the previous statement.

The denial of sexual dimorphism (but nods to #LadyBrian...oops #LadyBrian) is manipulation. The female sex is a category error. Males with #LadyFeelz are valid. Here is another consequence.
Look at this language? “Gestation becomes a commodity”
Spidey senses alerted yet?

I notice we don’t address transvestic fetishism re cross dressing. As for the “indistinguishable from “biological originals”I think thats likely in females on Testosterone (which packs a punch on females). With males, re passing, air suspect the wish is father to the thought.