Read on Twitter
1. Very expensive? It's a printed booklet Michael, which probably cost a couple of quid per copy, if that.
2. It was sent from a distribution centre, because we weren't going to mail them all by hand. Very suspicious.
3. It was a joint project, between Oxford University and
2. It was sent from a distribution centre, because we weren't going to mail them all by hand. Very suspicious.
3. It was a joint project, between Oxford University and
Woman's Place, which is what it says in the front matter.
4. It was funded by Oxford University, which is what it says in the front matter. That is where ALL the funding came from.
5. Have you read it?? I look forward to your considered critique of why this extremely
4. It was funded by Oxford University, which is what it says in the front matter. That is where ALL the funding came from.
5. Have you read it?? I look forward to your considered critique of why this extremely
well referenced piece of research, supported by documents that are publicly available, is a) wrong and b) the work of evil witches.
And heads up TRAs, you can read it too, here.
It's almost like this suspicious activity is completely transparent. http://www.thepoliticalerasureofsex.org
And heads up TRAs, you can read it too, here.
It's almost like this suspicious activity is completely transparent. http://www.thepoliticalerasureofsex.org
Christine, if you want to claim the content of the report is 'misinformation' I suggest you read it, and explain why it's wrong.
Helen, your source is talking rubbish. Weirdly we didn't need an extra 50 grand for two women to some research and then have some booklets printed.
Helen, your source is talking rubbish. Weirdly we didn't need an extra 50 grand for two women to some research and then have some booklets printed.
This piece of work has been in the public domain since October of last year.
We announced it, repeatedly, and we ran a webinar on it.
Not one of you has even accurately represented its contents, let alone critiqued or refuted it.
Not one of you.
We announced it, repeatedly, and we ran a webinar on it.
Not one of you has even accurately represented its contents, let alone critiqued or refuted it.
Not one of you.
It's not a rumour. We sent it to parliamentarians. We announced it.
READ THE REPORT. It's called 'SEX and the Census.' It's about the collection of SEX-data. No one is objecting to measuring the trans population. Although the TRM has compromised that data as well.
READ THE REPORT. It's called 'SEX and the Census.' It's about the collection of SEX-data. No one is objecting to measuring the trans population. Although the TRM has compromised that data as well.
Anyway, remind me next time I get paid an extra 50 grand by the Christian right to do some research and send out a document on data-integrity to MPs to make sure it's printed on gold leaf and covered in Swarkovski crystal.
