This issue is really bringing out the conflicts in either side - one side who react to structural injustice and microaggressions everywhere else but not on this, and the other side more sceptical of structural disadvantage and microaggression everywhere else but not on this https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1362354425155776513
Fwiw I think it's clear there is a lack of viewpoint diversity in our institutions - and I think that intersects with the other more traditional aspects of id politics more than people are letting on
But at the same time if it can happen on viewpoint in the academy - which is just the majority networks appointing in their own likeness - then can it not happen in the boardroom according to race, or gender?
Just kinds of looks like both sides just want to have their cake and eat it
You can follow @michael_merrick.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.