Tom is "high decoupling" here as is his habit, which some don't appreciate, but his point is reasonable. Men are victims of homicide at roughly twice the rate of women, for example, and "male disposability" tends to stand up as a theory. It's complicated. https://twitter.com/portraitinflesh/status/1361634037165621252

You can certainly say, for e.g "In some circumstances women are seen as 'valuable property' by men" as an explanation. You could link this to a possible lack of concern about women killed by "their owner" as opposed to women killed by strangers? This would be evidence of....

...misogyny on a systemic level, no? But- this wouldn't contradict the view that a woman killed by a stranger gets more sympathy than a man *killed by a stranger*. Males contain no value to other males- women are valuable, but as property, not "humans"?