Read on Twitter
So jokes about eliminating CENTCOM and reducing it to a 3 star subunified command aside (it's not a joke) there was one discussion point in this from the CNO that was, to be blunt, BS https://twitter.com/BDHerzinger/status/1361571874442911745
This is the book answer, and it's true as far as it goes, but the Navy has done an absolutely abysmal job of trying to protect its carriers/other high end forces from the CENTCOM grind
You are allowed to be contentious in GFM discussions, and you are allowed to make public statements explicitly targeting deployments to a particular AOR as being harmful to high end readiness
The AF did both re: bombers and as best I can tell no one got fired
The AF did both re: bombers and as best I can tell no one got fired
The Navy has done neither to my knowledge. It's one thing to have surrogates and reporters carry the message, it's another for a four star to explicitly publicly state a deployment tempo in a specific AOR is killing readiness
Until USN senior leadership does this, the conclusion to be drawn is they aren't serious in all their griping/don't actually care how the deployment tempo is killing the CSGs
