The language and inferences of evolutionary biology have never been more central to our shared dialogue. SARSCoV2 is evolving as the pandemic spreads, & teaching us about this process. Some lineages have gained mutations that increase their fitness (~transmission rate).
One result that we eagerly anticipate is the *same new trait arising in multiple independent populations.* We often donā€™t know what this trait will be at the outset, but the complete genome sequences of the evolving populations can point the way.
If the same gene or even the same amino acid repeatedly changes, independently, we have a strong inference that that change is an adaptation. How do we describe this phenomenon? Is it ā€œparallel evolution?ā€ Is it ā€œconvergent evolution?ā€ Does it matter? https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062240
Some definitions. Parallel evolution is the evolution of similar phenotypes or genotypes in multiple independent populations, in response to similar selection pressures, from *similar initial conditions.* Hereā€™s a schematic:
Convergent evolution is the evolution of similar phenotypes or genotypes in multiple independent populations, in response to similar selection pressures, from *different initial conditions.* Hereā€™s another schematic:
The key distinction is how we quantify similarity of starting conditions. Are starting pop's identical but growing in different envts or hosts? Are they genetically different but growing in same condition? For SARS-CoV-2, which just 15 mo ago was 1 virus in 1 host, it's tricky!
In 6 lineages this Q mutated to H, but remarkably in 2 different ways at the nucleotide level. In the 7th lineage, Q-> P. The parents of these lineages differ by a handful of mutations each, but they share some attributes also, including the well-described D614G mutation in Spike
From the perspective of this 614G mutation, we might call these changes *parallel,* but from the perspective of other mutations, we might call them *convergent.* I donā€™t think the language matters here but invite discussion.
Perhaps more striking, these arenā€™t the only 677 lineages of potential concern. 677H has arisen multiple times elsewhere in the world, including Egypt, Denmark, and India. Further, a
newly designated lineage, B.1.525, carries S: Q677H plus
several mutations seen in B.1.1.7.
Also, a 19B cluster with the ostensibly less fit, ā€˜ancestralā€™ D614 Spike, which has been circulating at ā‰¤ 2% of global frequency since August 2020, recently resurfaced as a newly reemergent lineage carrying N501Y together with 677H. @firefoxx66 @nextstrain
Whatā€™s the TLDR? Finding multiple lineages with increasing freq w/ the same mutation is likely not just recurrent chance mutation, but rather a product of chance AND selection. Whether you call this evolution parallel or convergent is up to you. (one more)
Regardless, letā€™s keep an eye on it and figure out how it works. Itā€™s still a grail of evolutionary biology and evolutionary medicine not just to find new adaptations but also to figure out how they work. Thanks for reading!
You can follow @vscooper.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword ā€œunrollā€ to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.