4/ Grade A evidence requires an RCT. RCT’s are designed treat context as a contaminant in order to answer a singular question—as a result, a large trial conducted at academic medical centers may not apply to the more resource-constrained hospitals where most Americans are born.
6/ Based on these data, and contrary to the AJOG authors, I actually believe replacing the term “elective” with “risk reducing” for 39 week inductions without medical indication is misleading...
8/Also, the specific risk in question obviously matters.

Those with medical indications face starker risks than those who do not.

Based on the data, the AJOG authors appear to be equating the risk of cesarean with the risk of perinatal death.
9/ so yes...we should revisit the term "elective"

and also...let's not call interventions "risk reducing" without being clear about the specific risks we're talking about and the important context that drives them
You can follow @neel_shah.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.