I agree, and I'll explain, since there are so many doubters: 1) The Dem managers are brilliant, and made this choice based on their superior fund of information- this is not incompetence. It is therefore either strategy, or determined by things outside the impeachment @gregolear https://twitter.com/gregolear/status/1360338250037161987
My best guess as to those reasons: 1) live witnesses are unpredictable and can say things that hurt a case. Hostile witnesses are hard to control - much easier/better to use their own videotaped in real time words, where you know what they'll say.
2) live witnesses take much more time than video clips, and preparing for a live witness takes much more time than the testimony. Adding 1 and 2 together, I'd guess the managers decided to make sure this case was TIGHT and done on time, so Dems can move on to their agenda.
3) I think Dems rightly guessed that no amount of evidence would get enough Rs, and Rs are happy to run out the clock on the Dem agenda - again good reasons to get this thing over with.
4) Most participants who could be called as a witness are potentially under FBI investigation, and would have to plead the 5th, or they are witnesses to the investigation and calling them may screw up the FBI's investigation. WHICH IS MASSIVE.
Did not know this ... maybe it changes things. https://twitter.com/21law/status/1360446620114984960?s=20
Update: if Raskin wants witnesses, I trust Raskin
UPDATE if Raskin doesn't want witnesses I trust Raskin
You can follow @DirkSchwenk.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.